[Bacula-users] symbolic links aren't followed, are they?

2006-08-19 Thread Jo Rhett
I just went through all available releases of the manual, plus used google to search the site, and I can't find any mention of symbolic links. I assumed that symbolic links were backed up as special files, and not followed. The reason I ask is this: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail

Re: [Bacula-users] symbolic links aren't followed, are they?

2006-08-19 Thread Bill Moran
Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just went through all available releases of the manual, plus used google to search the site, and I can't find any mention of symbolic links. I assumed that symbolic links were backed up as special files, and not followed. No. They're not followed. If

Re: [Bacula-users] symbolic links aren't followed, are they?

2006-08-19 Thread Jo Rhett
I assumed that symbolic links were backed up as special files, and not followed. On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 06:43:06PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: No. They're not followed. If you check the archives, you'll see I started a conversation about this where I suggested a new config value,