Re: [Bacula-users] understanding "status" of serveral daemons.

2007-10-09 Thread IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig)
hi mysteriously the list of terminated jobs have been synched during the backup cycle last night. so i am happy again :-) Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > You're looking at the state of terminated jobs. If the daemon in > question didn't save its state information before shutdown or restart, >

Re: [Bacula-users] understanding "status" of serveral daemons.

2007-10-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 08.10.2007 13:03,, IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote:: > hi. > > i am currently having trouble to understand why different daemons (fd, > sd, dir) show different statuses. > > my "problem": why does a job that runs on all daemons (dir, sd, fd) do > not show up in

[Bacula-users] understanding "status" of serveral daemons.

2007-10-08 Thread IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig)
hi. i am currently having trouble to understand why different daemons (fd, sd, dir) show different statuses. my "problem": why does a job that runs on all daemons (dir, sd, fd) do not show up in the "status" listings of these daemons? i haven't found much in-depth information in the docs, proba