Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-11 Thread Alex Huth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:47:03PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > On 11/10/2010 5:25 AM, Alex Huth wrote: > > Not to sound trite, and sorry if it does, but have you verified that the > time is indeed appropriate. And was your locale affected by recent time > change? I know the USA changed time l

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Dan Langille
On 11/10/2010 5:25 AM, Alex Huth wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:12:51PM +1100, James Harper wrote: on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next monday a incremental like expected. On the following tuesday bacula made a fullbackup instead of the incremental,

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Dan Langille
On 11/10/2010 4:12 AM, James Harper wrote: >>> on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next monday >>> a incremental like expected. On the following tuesday bacula made >>> a fullbackup instead of the incremental, because he didn´t find a prior >> fullbackup in the catalog. >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:51:25 +0100, Alex Huth said: > > Yes, i can see all jobs in the catalog and the fileset definition hasn > changed. Please post the full output from the job that was upgraded (everything from Start Backup JobId onwards) and also the output of llist jobid=OOO llist job

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Huth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:33:51PM +, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:56:36 +0100, Alex Huth said: > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:47:58AM -0300, Kleber Leal wrote: > > No i haven´t used this option. But i think i have seen a mistake. I used > > a file retention of 30 d

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:56:36 +0100, Alex Huth said: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:47:58AM -0300, Kleber Leal wrote: > > Please, post your jobs and jobdefs and schedules. > > > > Have you used Max Full Interval directive? > > > > > No i haven´t used this option. But i think i have seen a m

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Huth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:47:58AM -0300, Kleber Leal wrote: > Please, post your jobs and jobdefs and schedules. > > Have you used Max Full Interval directive? > > No i haven´t used this option. But i think i have seen a mistake. I used a file retention of 30 days in the client definition. Which

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Graham Keeling
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:12:51PM +1100, James Harper wrote: > > > on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next monday > > > a incremental like expected. On the following tuesday bacula made > > > a fullbackup instead of the incremental, because he didn´t find a prior > > full

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Kleber Leal
Please, post your jobs and jobdefs and schedules. Have you used Max Full Interval directive? Kleber 2010/11/10 Graham Keeling > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:12:51PM +1100, James Harper wrote: > > > > on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next > monday > > > > a incremental

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 11/10/2010 11:07 AM, Alex Huth wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:44:47AM +, Graham Keeling wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:32:16AM +0100, Alex Huth wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> We have a timetable for the backups, where we do fullbackups on the 1st >>> sunday, differentials on the oth

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Huth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:12:51PM +1100, James Harper wrote: > > > on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next monday > > > a incremental like expected. On the following tuesday bacula made > > > a fullbackup instead of the incremental, because he didn´t find a prior > > full

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread James Harper
> > on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next monday > > a incremental like expected. On the following tuesday bacula made > > a fullbackup instead of the incremental, because he didn´t find a prior > fullbackup in the catalog. > > > > The fullbackup on the 7th was the secon

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Huth
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:44:47AM +, Graham Keeling wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:32:16AM +0100, Alex Huth wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We have a timetable for the backups, where we do fullbackups on the 1st > > sunday, differentials on the other sundays and incremental on each other > >

Re: [Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Graham Keeling
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:32:16AM +0100, Alex Huth wrote: > Hello! > > We have a timetable for the backups, where we do fullbackups on the 1st > sunday, differentials on the other sundays and incremental on each other > day. > > on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next m

[Bacula-users] unwanted fullbackup

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Huth
Hello! We have a timetable for the backups, where we do fullbackups on the 1st sunday, differentials on the other sundays and incremental on each other day. on 07.11 (1st Sunday) bacula did a fullbackup like expected. Next monday a incremental like expected. On the following tuesday bacula made a