On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Quintin Giesbrecht wrote:
Restores work fine too, and regardless of what software you run, should
be done by a sys admin, imho.
I agree - if only because having users able to run restores trivially off
tape keeps them in bad habits about restoring data.
We have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Disks are very convenient but a bit expensive for archival storage. A
72 GB DAT tape is about $20. A hard drive is a bit more.
|
| You have to think about the the threats that you are protecting against.
These are real problems -- I'll address how
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 21:21, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Bacula requires an operator as opposed to a more simple system like
Lone-tar where you just have a secretary stick in the next tape and the
backup runs.
Yes this is true if all you have is one system or a few systems where all the
data fits
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:09 -0500, Quintin Giesbrecht wrote:
I would like to point out, that using bacula-web together with bacula, I
NEVER have to go to the console to do anything - I have everything
scripted - I backup 6 servers - all to ONE 100/200GB LTO tape. I don't
even check the backup
in - we were having problems prior to that with a failing
drive.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse
Keating
Sent: August 23, 2005 3:23 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] FW: Other testimonials?
On Tue
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:10 -0500, Quintin Giesbrecht wrote:
Restores work fine too, and regardless of what software you run,
should
be done by a sys admin, imho.
Changing tapes, and checking the backup should be able to be done by
anyone, and bacula is quite capable of that.
The reason
] On Behalf Of Jesse
Keating
Sent: August 23, 2005 4:26 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] FW: Other testimonials?
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:10 -0500, Quintin Giesbrecht wrote:
Restores work fine too, and regardless of what software you run,
should
be done by a sys
