> On Wed, 01 May 2013 19:50:03 +0200, Erik P Olsen said:
>
> On 01/05/13 17:30, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:40:09 +0200, Erik P Olsen said:
> >>
> >> On 17/04/13 09:24, Simone Caronni wrote:
> >>> Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing
> >>>
On 01/05/13 17:30, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:40:09 +0200, Erik P Olsen said:
>>
>> On 17/04/13 09:24, Simone Caronni wrote:
>>> Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing repository
>>> [1]
>>> or from my repository [2]?
>>>
>>> Can you please check t
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:40:09 +0200, Erik P Olsen said:
>
> On 17/04/13 09:24, Simone Caronni wrote:
> > Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing repository
> > [1]
> > or from my repository [2]?
> >
> > Can you please check the last part of the file
> >
> > /usr/share
On 17/04/13 09:24, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing repository [1]
> or from my repository [2]?
>
> Can you please check the last part of the file
>
> /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.13/README.Redhat
>
> and see if it's a permission problem on
On 17/04/13 09:24, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing repository [1]
> or from my repository [2]?
>
> Can you please check the last part of the file
>
> /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.13/README.Redhat
>
> and see if it's a permission problem on
Have you installed 5.2.13 on your own, from the updates-testing repository
[1] or from my repository [2]?
Can you please check the last part of the file
/usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.13/README.Redhat
and see if it's a permission problem on the /etc/bacula directory?
[1]
https://admin.fedorap
On 17/04/13 07:04, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 17/04/13 00:27, LDC - Gustavo El Khoury wrote:
>> On 16/04/2013, at 05:05 p.m., "Erik P. Olsen" wrote:
>>
>>> Server is newly installed bacula 5.2.13 on 64-bit fedora 18. There are two
>>> clients, one on the server box and one a 32-bit windows 7. The w
On 17/04/13 00:27, LDC - Gustavo El Khoury wrote:
> On 16/04/2013, at 05:05 p.m., "Erik P. Olsen" wrote:
>
>> Server is newly installed bacula 5.2.13 on 64-bit fedora 18. There are two
>> clients, one on the server box and one a 32-bit windows 7. The windows
>> client is
>> win32-6.0.6. Previousl
On 16/04/2013, at 05:05 p.m., "Erik P. Olsen" wrote:
> Server is newly installed bacula 5.2.13 on 64-bit fedora 18. There are two
> clients, one on the server box and one a 32-bit windows 7. The windows client
> is
> win32-6.0.6. Previously the server and clients were bacula 5.0.3 with which I
users] Authentication Problem
Saur, Achim wrote:
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bruno Friedmann [mailto:br...@ioda-net.ch]
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Januar 2009 15:04
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Authentication Problem
Saur, Achim wrote:
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bruno Friedmann [mailto:br...@ioda-net.ch]
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Januar 2009 15:04
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Authentication Problem
>
> Saur, Achim wrote:
>
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bruno Friedmann [mailto:br...@ioda-net.ch]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Januar 2009 15:04
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Authentication Problem
Saur, Achim wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> we have a problem with authentica
Saur, Achim wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> we have a problem with authentication between the various Daemons.
>
> The strange thing is, that if I enter in the address field 127.0.0.1 I get no
> error. And I can backup the Local Host.
>
> If I put in the dir.conf , sd.conf and fd.conf an addr
13 matches
Mail list logo
