Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula defaulting to SQLite

2016-08-19 Thread Dan Langille
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 12:16 PM, orocairion wrote: > > Thanks a lot!. That did the trick. You are welcome. > > I have another question, You should start a new email. Don't reply to this one. It's about SQLite. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula defaulting to SQLite

2016-08-19 Thread orocairion
Thanks a lot!. That did the trick. I have another question, if I want to send the backups to a different server than where the director is installed, I only have to install the Storage Daemon in the server where I want to store them?. -- View this message in context: http://bacula.10910.n7.nab

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula defaulting to SQLite

2016-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On 17/08/16 00:32, Heitor Faria wrote: > > apt-get update > apt-get -y mysql-server > apt-get -y install bacula-director-mysql bacula-sd-mysql bacula-fd > bacula-console postfix mt-st mtx If you have a tape drive, I'd _strongly_ urge installing sg3-utils and sg3-utils-udev If you don't have thes

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula defaulting to SQLite

2016-08-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I think Heitor gave the best possible answer. However, a tip for the future: on a Debian or Debian derivative system (using apt), a good way to know what is available in terms of packages is to do something like: apt-cache search where in this case you would have replaced with bacula.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula defaulting to SQLite

2016-08-16 Thread Heitor Faria
- Original Message - > From: "orocairion" > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:45:23 PM > Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula defaulting to SQLite > Hello all, I'm new to bacula and I'm having a bit of an issue while trying to > install Bacula from apt-