> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:01:57 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
>
> On 02/16/2012 05:01 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > In theory encryption does just need the public-key. Encrypting needs the
> > private key. but I don't know if it is possible to provide only the
> > public key to bacula-sd.
>
>
Am Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:01:57 -0500 schrieb Phil Stracchino:
> On 02/16/2012 05:01 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> In theory encryption does just need the public-key. Encrypting needs
>> the private key. but I don't know if it is possible to provide only the
>> public key to bacula-sd.
>
> I believe
On 02/16/2012 05:01 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> In theory encryption does just need the public-key. Encrypting needs the
> private key. but I don't know if it is possible to provide only the
> public key to bacula-sd.
I believe you mean that DEcrypting requires the private key.
--
Phil Stra
On 16.02.2012 12:32, Wassim Zaarour wrote:
> What I was thinking is of a way maybe to have some password based
> encryption, where only the users know his password but I didn't find any
> solution that can work like this.
> I guess for now we have to settle that the IT admin. Or the Sys admin have
What I was thinking is of a way maybe to have some password based
encryption, where only the users know his password but I didn't find any
solution that can work like this.
I guess for now we have to settle that the IT admin. Or the Sys admin have
access to the encrypted data.
Wassim C. Zaaro
Am Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:07:40 +0200 schrieb Wassim Zaarour:
> Hello,
>
> Currently the data encryption option in Bacula is based on certificates,
> meaning that if the person creating the certificates for the client
> keeps his copy of the certs, he is able to restore and decrypt the data
> withou
