Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-03-01 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 25/02/11 16:05, Paulo Martinez wrote: > Am 24.02.2011 um 23:08 schrieb Erik P. Olsen: >> I moved from bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.3. It was not an upgrade, it was a >> new install. >> However, the database was copied from the old system to the new >> after a version >> upgrade. >> >> Unfortunately I am

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-25 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 24.02.2011 um 23:08 schrieb Erik P. Olsen: > I moved from bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.3. It was not an upgrade, it was a > new install. > However, the database was copied from the old system to the new > after a version > upgrade. > > Unfortunately I am unable to check if the indexes have been creat

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-24 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 24/02/11 16:12, Jan Lentfer wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:08:43 +0100, "Erik P. Olsen" > wrote: >> Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore >> times. >> The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time > used >> to be >> measured in minutes,

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-24 Thread Jan Lentfer
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:08:43 +0100, "Erik P. Olsen" wrote: > Since I moved to version 5.0.3 I have experienced extemely long restore > times. > The time is mostly spend in the building of directory trees. The time used > to be > measured in minutes, now it is hours. > > My system is Fedora 14,

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/23/11 17:42, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > Thanks for the tip but unfortunately it didn't change anything when it comes > to > speed. I ran "sudo mysqlcheck -Aaov" and got among apparently normal messages > the following surfaced: > > note : The storage engine for the table doesn't support o

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 23/02/11 18:01, Daniel Etter wrote: > 2011/2/23 Erik P. Olsen: >> Backup is swift so I don't understand why building of directory trees should >> take so long time. When the directory trees have been build, the restore is >> as >> swift as the backup. >> >> I suspect problems with the mysql dat

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely long restore times.

2011-02-23 Thread Daniel Etter
2011/2/23 Erik P. Olsen : > Backup is swift so I don't understand why building of directory trees should > take so long time. When the directory trees have been build, the restore is as > swift as the backup. > > I suspect problems with the mysql database but have no idea of what I > could/should d