Re: [Bacula-users] Optimal setup for large data

2007-09-11 Thread Kyle Marsh
Tom, I ran into the same problem about bacula rescheduling a second full backup. This should only happen the first time, since in following cycles the next incremental backup should see the previous full backup and run off that, but it's still no fun to have a single backup that huge. My solution

Re: [Bacula-users] Optimal setup for large data

2007-09-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 30.08.2007 09:12,, Tom Sommer wrote:: > On Mon, August 27, 2007 13:05, Arno Lehmann wrote: > >>> My primary concern is after 7 days, I will still have more data stored >>> than I actually need to recover files 7 days back. >> This can be achieved. You've only got to make sure volumes are >> a

Re: [Bacula-users] Optimal setup for large data

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Sommer
On Mon, August 27, 2007 13:05, Arno Lehmann wrote: >> My primary concern is after 7 days, I will still have more data stored >> than I actually need to recover files 7 days back. > > This can be achieved. You've only got to make sure volumes are > actually purged after they run out of retention.

Re: [Bacula-users] Optimal setup for large data

2007-08-27 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 27.08.2007 12:06,, Tom Sommer wrote:: > Hi, > > I was hoping someone had some expert advice regarding a possible Bacula > setup, in a fairly large scale - I would say Enterprise. > > I have around 250+ clients with an average of 20GB per client I need to > backup. Some clients, such as mails