On 10/05/11 15:54, Ben Walton wrote:
> What mysql are you building against? The included one? More to the
> point, which compiler was it built with?
MySQL 5.5.8, Solaris 10 package from Oracle. Need to update that actually.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71
Excerpts from Phil Stracchino's message of Wed Oct 05 15:26:06 -0400 2011:
> I've been trying, but have yet to succeed. I think it would
> probably be a lot simpler if Solaris 10 came in all-32-bit and
> all-64-bit flavors, instead of the hybrid mixture of 32-bit and
> 64-bit it is at present. I
On 10/05/11 15:14, Ben Walton wrote:
> Excerpts from Phil Stracchino's message of Wed Oct 05 14:51:57 -0400 2011:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
>> Side note: It was unreasonably difficult to get it built correctly
>> on Solaris 10. I couldn't get a working 64-bit build at all, either
>> with gcc or with Sun St
Excerpts from Phil Stracchino's message of Wed Oct 05 14:51:57 -0400 2011:
Hi Phil,
> Side note: It was unreasonably difficult to get it built correctly
> on Solaris 10. I couldn't get a working 64-bit build at all, either
> with gcc or with Sun Studio, and the only way I could get a
> correctly
On 10/05/11 09:37, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> I've been using non-batch insertion with postgres (following your dare,
> I think, Phil) for about a year. Backups are only about 8TB, but it
> works extremely well for us.
So, I just built bacula-5.1.14 from git, with batch disabled. And we'll
see
On 10/05/11 10:25, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:37:37PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>>
>> I've been using non-batch insertion with postgres (following your dare, I
>> think, Phil) for about a year. Backups are only about 8TB, but it works
>> extremely well for us.
>>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:37:37PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> I've been using non-batch insertion with postgres (following your dare, I
> think, Phil) for about a year. Backups are only about 8TB, but it works
> extremely well for us.
>
Hi folks,
thanks for your recommendations an
On 5 Oct 2011, at 14:23, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/05/11 05:07, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm wondering about the best mysql settings for our new bacula
>> installation which will be taking over from an older setup.
>>
>> Current bacula db size is 55G, we have around 14TB
On 10/05/11 05:07, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm wondering about the best mysql settings for our new bacula
> installation which will be taking over from an older setup.
>
> Current bacula db size is 55G, we have around 14TB backup data from
> ca. 100 clients on disk storage ATM but
