On Friday 04 November 2005 19:53, Ove Risberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 14:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Friday 04 November 2005 12:31, Ove Risberg wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
> > > and after readin
Hello,
For any one interested in performance tuning, I have added documentation to
src/version.h in the current CVS for all the performance #defines that are
available. Also, you can also get valuable information by disabling Catalog
Updates using the "Use Catalog = no" directive in your pool.
> Ribi> If I enable gzip I have the same low speed (with or w/o
> Ribi> --enable-smartalloc).
>
> Turn it off, let the drive do the work.
Yes, that is how I configured it now.
> Ribi> At the moment bacula runs fast enougth. The only problem to
> Ribi> solve is OS/Hardware related. My Tape runs a
Ribi> I also disableb gzip compression at the same time.
I'd disable gzip anyway, let the drive with it's dedicated compression
do the work. Also, make sure that on your Sun boxes you have the
Gigabit ethernet cards (if not using the onboard ones) in the 66mhz
PCI slots, and not the 33mhz ones.
8.1,
> > > Postgres 8.0, with CFLAGS=-O2/CXXFLAGS=-O2
> > >
> > > I compiled it with gcc 3.4.4, which I compiled myself,
> > > because on solaris 10
> > > there is'nt any binary distribution.
> > >
> > > I think that there are 2 Problems,
> >
> > I compiled it with gcc 3.4.4, which I compiled myself,
> > because on solaris 10
> > there is'nt any binary distribution.
> >
> > I think that there are 2 Problems, one is the performance of Bacula or
> > Postgres itself and also some pro
think that there are 2 Problems, one is the performance of Bacula or
> > Postgres itself and also some problems with the tape. I
> > did'nt get more
> > then 2.6Mb/s with the ufsdump from solaris.
> >
> > Anybody can help?
> >
> > > -Ori
pe. I
> did'nt get more
> then 2.6Mb/s with the ufsdump from solaris.
>
> Anybody can help?
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Ove Risberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 PM
> > To: Ribi Roland
> > S
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 14:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Friday 04 November 2005 12:31, Ove Risberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
> > and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some source code
> > I increase
I changed the MaximumNetworkBufferSize to 65536 in the file and storage
daemon configuration.
Please reply with your results.
/Ove
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 16:29, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> What did you ultimately change on your site that might be of interest to
> others on the list? I'd be interes
What did you ultimately change on your site that might be of interest to
others on the list? I'd be interested to know. I'm not going to get 3
MB/s, since I have a drive that writes slower than that, but any ways to
boost performance would be interesting.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | |
Hello,
On Friday 04 November 2005 12:31, Ove Risberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
> and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some source code
> I increased it from 300KB/s to 3MB/s when backuping the root filesystem.
>
> Afte
12 matches
Mail list logo
