Re: [Bacula-users] Pros and Cons of Mutiple Pools

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> Are these jobs concurrent? I'm guessing no. > For the most part no because this is not really a requirement in my case. > I'm seeing more and more requirements for duplicate/identical > backups. That is, identical from a legal standpoint. > These files are different than most people would have

Re: [Bacula-users] Pros and Cons of Mutiple Pools

2007-11-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Nov 2007 at 23:15, John Drescher wrote: > > > ArchiveData-LTO2 - Archived Medical Images Set # 1 > > > ArchiveData2-LTO2 - Archived Medical Images Set # 2 > > > > How do you manage to get two copies of your backups? > > > I do full backups of the same folder (usually containing hundreds of >

Re: [Bacula-users] Pros and Cons of Mutiple Pools

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> > ArchiveData-LTO2 - Archived Medical Images Set # 1 > > ArchiveData2-LTO2 - Archived Medical Images Set # 2 > > How do you manage to get two copies of your backups? > I do full backups of the same folder (usually containing hundreds of GB of data) on each of the above pools with a different job

Re: [Bacula-users] Pros and Cons of Mutiple Pools

2007-11-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Nov 2007 at 22:45, John Drescher wrote: > I think this is all a matter of preference. I have at minimum 10 > pools. Mainly because I have different kinds of media and different > things I want to backup seperately and I also keep at least 2 full > copies of all important stuff with the copie

Re: [Bacula-users] Pros and Cons of Mutiple Pools

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
> I have been using bacula for more than two months now and quite happy with it. > However, there are some points still unclear to me. As an example, I run a > backup job which does both full and differential saves and am undecided to > use either a single pool or one pool for each level. Can someo