Hello,
as I said some times ago I tested with a QSI card :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:7:0:class=0x01 card=0x53492050 chip=0x10201077
rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'QLogic Corporation'
device = 'QLA1020/104x Fast-Wide-SCSI Fast!SCSI IQ Host
Adapter'
class = mass storage
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:37:05AM +, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Julien Cigar wrote:
Yes the SCSI card is an Adaptec
Which model and revision?
Several older Adaptec scsi HBAs are _very_ sensitive to
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
After I had a look at the release notes for 2.4.4-b1 and the bug
tracker I suggest you try the 2.4.4-b1 SD - as far as I can see, bug
1192 *could* be what you found. It should be sufficient to ./configure
and make the 2.4.4
Julien Cigar schrieb:
...
(sa0:isp0:0:5:0): REWIND. CDB: 1 0 0 0 0 0
(sa0:isp0:0:5:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
(sa0:isp0:0:5:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition
(sa0:isp0:0:5:0): MEDIUM ERROR asc:52,0
(sa0:isp0:0:5:0): Cartridge fault
(sa0:isp0:0:5:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data)
Hi Ralf, here is my config :
Device {
Name = Sony SDX-700C
Media Type = AIT
Archive Device = /dev/nsa0
Device Type = tape
Autochanger = no
Always Open = yes
Volume Poll Interval = 1 hour
Removable Media = yes
Random Access = no
Requires Mount = no
Hardware End of Medium = no
Julien Cigar schrieb:
Are you sure you need these additional options?
Hardware End of Medium = no
Backward Space Record = no
Backward Space File= no
Fast Forward Space File = no
BSF at EOM = yes
Two EOF = yes
I remember that there has been some discussion on the list
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:33 +0100, Ralf Gross wrote:
Julien Cigar schrieb:
Are you sure you need these additional options?
Hardware End of Medium = no
Backward Space Record = no
Backward Space File= no
Fast Forward Space File = no
BSF at EOM = yes
Two EOF = yes
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
After I had a look at the release notes for 2.4.4-b1 and the bug
tracker I suggest you try the 2.4.4-b1 SD - as far as I can see, bug
1192 *could* be what you
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:04:34 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:33 +0100, Ralf Gross wrote:
Julien Cigar schrieb:
Are you sure you need these additional options?
Hardware End of Medium = no
Backward Space Record = no
Backward Space File= no
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:08:38PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
After I had a look at the release notes for 2.4.4-b1 and the bug
tracker I suggest you try
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:20:37 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:50 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:04:34 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:33 +0100, Ralf Gross wrote:
Julien Cigar schrieb:
Are you sure you need these
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:50 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:20:37 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:50 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:04:34 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:33 +0100, Ralf Gross wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Julien Cigar wrote:
Which model and revision?
I posted the full output on the FreeBSD ML some times ago :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-November/003706.html
Is that Ultra or LVD?
Ultra 160/320 single-ended scsi have maximum cable lengths in the
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:44 +, Alan Brown wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Julien Cigar wrote:
Which model and revision?
I posted the full output on the FreeBSD ML some times ago :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-November/003706.html
Is that Ultra or LVD?
Ultra
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:17:54 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 13:50 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:20:37 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:50 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:04:34 +0100, Julien Cigar said:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Julien Cigar wrote:
Yes the SCSI card is an Adaptec
Which model and revision?
Several older Adaptec scsi HBAs are _very_ sensitive to scsi bus
termination and length issues.
AB
-
This SF.Net email is
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:37:05AM +, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Julien Cigar wrote:
Yes the SCSI card is an Adaptec
Which model and revision?
Several older Adaptec scsi HBAs are _very_ sensitive to scsi bus
termination and length issues.
Hmm.. I have pretty long SCSI
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 10:37 +, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Julien Cigar wrote:
Yes the SCSI card is an Adaptec
Which model and revision?
I posted the full output on the FreeBSD ML some times ago :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-November/003706.html
Previously, From: Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
Thread 26 (Thread -1215112304 (LWP 5413)):
#0 0xb7f6a410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7adba41 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x080a99b9 in bnet_thread_server (addrs=0x80f9860, max_clients=20,
Hi,
03.12.2008 17:28, Bob Hetzel wrote:
Previously, From: Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
Thread 26 (Thread -1215112304 (LWP 5413)):
#0 0xb7f6a410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7adba41 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x080a99b9 in bnet_thread_server
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:53:41PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.11.2008 15:10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:14:45AM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:53:41PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.11.2008 15:10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:14:45AM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that I came across the exact same error
Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
a couple of times with 2.4.2 using a Quantum DLT VS1 drive connected to
Adaptec 29160LP. I don't think that the tape is really defective as
bacula states. I
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:30:06PM +0100, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that I came across the exact same error
Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
a couple of times with 2.4.2 using a Quantum DLT VS1 drive connected to
Adaptec
Same problem here with a Sony SDX-700C
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 15:30 +0100, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that I came across the exact same error
Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
a couple of times with 2.4.2 using a Quantum DLT VS1
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:48:24PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:30:06PM +0100, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that I came across the exact same error
Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
a couple
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Julien Cigar wrote:
Same problem here with a Sony SDX-700C
Thanks for the report. Do you also have Adaptec SCSI HBA?
-- Pasi
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 15:30 +0100, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that I came across the
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:11:11PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Julien Cigar wrote:
Same problem here with a Sony SDX-700C
Thanks for the report. Do you also have Adaptec SCSI HBA?
And which OS?
I'm running CentOS 5.2 x86 32bit.
-- Pasi
Yes the SCSI card is an Adaptec (I replaced it today with a QSI Logic to
see if I have better results).
The OS is FreeBSD 7.0-p6 (32 bits) with the ahc driver.
What's strange is that I can write many jobs without any problems, but
then it suddenly fails, always with the same error (Error writing
Julien, hi Pasi,
it looks like we have similar problems. But to be honest I have no real
clue whats causing them. Right now it could be anything from a HBA
driver problem to a bug in bacula.
I will just give you some details about our setup so maybe we can find
similarities.
I just looked in
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Julien Cigar wrote:
Yes the SCSI card is an Adaptec (I replaced it today with a QSI Logic to
see if I have better results).
The OS is FreeBSD 7.0-p6 (32 bits) with the ahc driver.
What's strange is that I can write many jobs without any problems, but
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:25:32PM +0100, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
Julien, hi Pasi,
it looks like we have similar problems. But to be honest I have no real
clue whats causing them. Right now it could be anything from a HBA
driver problem to a bug in bacula.
I will just give you some
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:53:41PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.11.2008 15:10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:14:45AM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
Hello,
29.11.2008 19:45, Bob Hetzel wrote:
From: Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:14:45 +0100
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
info. When I run a status storage produces the
From: Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:14:45 +0100
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
info. When I run a status storage produces the following...
Is your Bacula still stuck? If
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:14:45AM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
info. When I run a status storage produces the following...
Is your Bacula still stuck? If so, and you have
Hi,
27.11.2008 15:10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:14:45AM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
info. When I run a status storage produces the following...
Is your
Hi,
26.11.2008 21:22, Bob Hetzel wrote:
I've got bacula currently in a hung state with the following interesting
info. When I run a status storage produces the following...
Is your Bacula still stuck? If so, and you have gdb installed, and a
Bacula with debug symbols, now might be a good
38 matches
Mail list logo
