On 07/13/2011 12:01 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:47:31 +0200, Pierre Bourgin said:
This bug is corrected only in the devel branch code.
So I just have to wait some weeks for the 5.2 release or backport the
patch on the 5.0.3 code on my own, right ?
Yes. The patch in bug
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:47:31 +0200, Pierre Bourgin said:
This bug is corrected only in the devel branch code.
So I just have to wait some weeks for the 5.2 release or backport the
patch on the 5.0.3 code on my own, right ?
Yes. The patch in bug 1703 should work in 5.0.3 too, so adding it
- Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
Hello,
I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system (RPM
x86_64 rebuilt from source) and it's working great since a year.
After a mistake I mad, I need
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
- Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
Hello,
I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system (RPM
x86_64 rebuilt from
On 07/12/2011 06:02 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
- Martin Simmonsmar...@lispworks.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
Hello,
I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
Hello,
I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system (RPM x86_64
rebuilt from source) and it's working great since a year.
After a mistake I mad, I need to restore my catalog.
So I tried to use bextract in
