Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Status + Bacula 5.2.0 release
tank you for the usefull info :) I know that the project is not dead, but when someone have to choose the backup solution and goes on the website, there are very few news and it seems stopped, I think it will be nice to get some developing news from the website too ciao Mauro -- The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Copy Jobs with Allow Duplicate Jobs = no defined in original job causes failed jobs during Copy Job runs
I just started working with Copy jobs, and while they are working (mostly) exactly as expected I am seeing the following strangeness... When I run my defined Copy job which is set with: -- Type = Copy Selection Type = Job Selection Pattern = Zimbra -- It spawns the CopyMustHaves job and the (per docs) Previous backup job like so: (sorry for the word wrap) Running Jobs: JobId Level Name Status == 10415 FullCopyMustHaves.2011-10-28_12.17.03_59 is running 10416 FullZimbra.2011-10-28_12.17.04_00 has a fatal error 10417 FullCopyMustHaves.2011-10-28_12.17.04_01 is waiting on max Client jobs 10418 FullZimbra.2011-10-28_12.17.04_02 has a fatal error 10419 FullCopyMustHaves.2011-10-28_12.17.04_03 is waiting on max Client jobs 10420 FullZimbra.2011-10-28_12.17.04_04 has a fatal error 10421 FullCopyMustHaves.2011-10-28_12.17.04_05 is waiting on max Client jobs 10422 FullZimbra.2011-10-28_12.17.04_06 has a fatal error 10423 FullCopyMustHaves.2011-10-28_12.17.04_07 is waiting on max Client jobs 10424 FullZimbra.2011-10-28_12.17.04_08 has a fatal error (I have configured Max Client Jobs = 1 for that client, so those are OK) BUT since I have Allow Duplicate Jobs = no on the original Zimbra Job definition to prevent multiples of the same job to be queued if/when a job takes too long to run, for EACH and every Copy job, I also get an ERROR report for the Zimbra Job, and of course error status in my job history... For example, here is an email I get during one of these copy jobs: --[snip]-- Subject: Backup Fatal Error - Zimbra JobId=10418 Level=Full 8-Oct 12:17 speedy-dir JobId 10418: Fatal error: JobId 10382 already running. Duplicate job not allowed. --[snip]-- I don't believe it is the desired behavior to be getting these error messages and FAILED jobs in history. Is there a way around this situation where I WANT to disallow duplicate, concurrent running of the original Zimbra job AND have copy jobs work as expected too? I'd be happy to post any additional configs etc if that helps... Thanks for any hints on this -- Bill Arlofski Reverse Polarity, LLC http://www.revpol.com/ -- The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] restore windows problem
Arnau, That got it! What worked was this: cd F:\\/ Hopefully no one will be like my predecessor and do such an obscure way of specifying windows volumes. Thanks for the help. Steve +-- |This was sent by willi...@csr.utexas.edu via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] FileSet Question (related to snapshots)
Greetings,
Minor question, figured I'd try the users list first in case you guys could
help. I have the following directory structure on a server that I back up,
but there's a minor twist:
FileSet {
Name = filemonster-fs
Include {
*snip*
File = /etc
File = /usr/local/sbin
File = /snapshot/webdata
}
*snip*
}
That snapshot directory (/snapshot/webdata) is actually a mounted snapshot
of /data. Ideally, I would like bacula to store this as the actual path, and
not the path it gets backed up from. It would greatly simplify restores
among other things.
I know there is the option of stripping X pieces of the path from a fileset,
but it is fileset wide to my knowledge. Is the best practice to just add a
snapshot dir to the beginning and keep the same path structure, and have a
seperate FileSet for each such item?
The reason I ask is I am also considering adding a PathReplace directive (or
something similar) to facilitate the above, and I want to judge input first,
and see if there is a better design option.
-Blake
--
Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook
in minutes. BlackBerry App World#153; now supports Android#153; Apps
for the BlackBerryreg; PlayBook#153;. Discover just how easy and simple
it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
