On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/30/11 12:59, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino
>> wrote:
>>> I just compared what the script was doing to the existing schema and
>>> made the necessary changes by hand. Wasn't a problem, and
On 10/30/11 12:59, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> I just compared what the script was doing to the existing schema and
>> made the necessary changes by hand. Wasn't a problem, and nothing
>> non-obvious showed up.
>>
>
> So you did not make an u
Hello Geert,
You're right, please see the right documentation's link below
http://bacula-web.dflc.ch/index.php/docs.html
Thanks for your feedback.
Regards
Davide
Op 20111024 om 13:04 schreef bacula-...@dflc.ch:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm proud to announce you that from now, you're able to subs
The quickest way to find out is to configure a backup without crypto and see
how long it takes. You could also do another test with GZIP compression on/off.
---Guy
(via iPhone)
On 30 Oct 2011, at 16:23, Alex Crow wrote:
>
>>> If it is supported in any way, I'd be happy to know. If not, what
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/27/11 15:44, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Looks like the DB upgrade scripts for 5.2.0 can upgrade the DB from
>>> v5.0, but not from v5.1. I have a v13 database. I'm patching the DB
>>> manually right now, but this may leave people who'v
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 15:35 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today, we released Bacula version 5.2.1. If you downloaded version
> 5.2.0, sorry for the inconvenience, but I *strongly recommend you
> download version 5.2.1 to avoid possible problems.
>
indeed -- fantastic news :-)
can
> Could it be the "compression=GZIP" in the job defs that is slowing
> things down?
>
Yes. Try disabling that.
> I really should get my colleague to join this as he's the one that set
> this up.
>
John
--
Get your Andro
>> If it is supported in any way, I'd be happy to know. If not, what would
>> be the best way about getting it implemented?
> I'd want to be pretty sure its going to help before doing this. On my
> (somewhat aged) development machine, OpenSSL can do AES-128 CBC at 55
> MB/s (bytes, not bits), so i
> - Ability to Verify any specified Job
Thank You very much for implementing this. I will test as soon as I
can. Many times at work (academic department of ~20 users, ~50
machines and ~50TB of data) I have wanted to verify my jobs but the
previous functionality was not very functional for me espec
Hello,
Today, we released Bacula version 5.2.1. If you downloaded version
5.2.0, sorry for the inconvenience, but I *strongly recommend you
download version 5.2.1 to avoid possible problems.
Several people have commented lately that the Bacula project appears
dead, but it is not at all the case.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Alex Crow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have set up a backup server that uses encryption in the File Daemon.
> However we find it is really slow, in fact we are only getting about
> 80Mbps (megabits, not -bytes) throughput while running 4 backup threads.
> This is backing up
11 matches
Mail list logo
