Re: [Bacula-users] console messages

2012-10-01 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Sunday 30 September 2012 00:54:14 Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: Hello, 2012/9/28 Gary Stainburn g...@ringways.co.uk Is there a way to limit the entries displayed to say the last 4 hours, or the last 1000 lines? No. But you can simply disable console messages. Is there a way to

Re: [Bacula-users] console messages

2012-10-01 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2012/10/1 Gary Stainburn g...@ringways.co.uk Is there a way to dynamically turn message logging off / on? I don't know. I use the console logging while working in bconsole but don't need it the rest of the time. I think you can simply truncate a console message buffer before

Re: [Bacula-users] Unexpected cryptographic session data stream on restore

2012-10-01 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com: On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:25:42 +0200, lst hoe02 said: It looks like the error arises if the FD does not overwrite some files on restore. This confuses the PKI code and subsequent file restore fails also. In our case it was a fresh formated NTFS

Re: [Bacula-users] Extremely Slow Performance on VMware

2012-10-01 Thread Josh Fisher
On 9/28/2012 12:15 PM, Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes wrote: I have a physical machine that is a Vmware ESX node wich hosts only one vm, the one with bacula-director, bacula-sd and bacula-fd (called bacula-server), this vm has an RDM with the fibre channel storage where the volumes partition is

[Bacula-users] compilation failure on OpenIndiana

2012-10-01 Thread Boris Epstein
Hello all, I've got an OpenIndiana machine (SunOS 5.11) on which I am trying to compile Bacula 5.2.12 with Postgres support. As I go along it fails at the following juncture: *** Error code 1 The following command caused the error: /usr/bin/g++ -c -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Alan Brown wrote (2012/10/01): 2Mb is the maximum block size I've found to work on LTO* - it's a bacula limit, not an LTO one. Or it could be a limit of an operating system or of used hw interface. Increasing from 65535 will improve throughput significantly. There have been discussions

[Bacula-users] RunAfterJob to eject tape works on successful jobs, but hangs bacula forever on cancelled jobs

2012-10-01 Thread Jesse Osby
I'm actually having this same problem on two different bacula setups for two different clients. Details are: Bacula 5.0.3 on CentOS 5.3 x86 -- HP StorageWorks 8-slot LTO3 changer Bacula 5.2.12 on CentOS 5.8 x86 -- Dell PV-124T 16-slot LTO3 changer I'll give specifics on the 1st setup,

[Bacula-users] Problems with make-mysql-tables script

2012-10-01 Thread George Sokolov
Hello, I got problems with make_mysql_tables script. When I running the script, I got the message about SQL syntax error, under the line 414 or 415. My Bacula version is 5.2.6 from Debian back ports repository. MySQL version is 5.1 Any ideas ? Thanks in advance.

Re: [Bacula-users] newbie - problem labeling / adding tapes to pool

2012-10-01 Thread Simon Tyler
Hi Tim, I don't know about another application but bacula does correctly read the barcode labels during: update slots scan eg. below. But then it doesn't seem to be able to find it when I try to add it to the catalog, it's just ignored. In the example below, this is after me uninstalling and

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread Stephen Thompson
Hi, I ran some btape tests today to verify that I'd be improving throughput by changing blocksize from 256KB to 2MB and found that this does indeed appear to be true in terms of increasing compression efficiency, but it doesn't seem to affect incompressible data much, if at all. Still, it

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread James Harper
Hi, I ran some btape tests today to verify that I'd be improving throughput by changing blocksize from 256KB to 2MB and found that this does indeed appear to be true in terms of increasing compression efficiency, but it doesn't seem to affect incompressible data much, if at all. Still,

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread Stephen Thompson
On 10/01/2012 03:52 PM, James Harper wrote: Hi, I ran some btape tests today to verify that I'd be improving throughput by changing blocksize from 256KB to 2MB and found that this does indeed appear to be true in terms of increasing compression efficiency, but it doesn't seem to affect

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread Alan Brown
On 01/10/12 23:38, Stephen Thompson wrote: More importantly, I realized that my testing 6 months ago was not on all 4 of my drives, but only 2 of them. Today, I discovered one of my drives (untested in the past) is getting 1/2 the throughput for random data writes as the others!!

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread Stephen Thompson
On 10/1/12 4:06 PM, Alan Brown wrote: On 01/10/12 23:38, Stephen Thompson wrote: More importantly, I realized that my testing 6 months ago was not on all 4 of my drives, but only 2 of them. Today, I discovered one of my drives (untested in the past) is getting 1/2 the throughput for random

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity (variable?)

2012-10-01 Thread Stephen Thompson
Correction, the non-problem drive has a higher ECC fast error count, but the problem drive has a significantly higher Corrective algorithm invocations count. On 10/1/12 5:33 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: On 10/1/12 4:06 PM, Alan Brown wrote: On 01/10/12 23:38, Stephen Thompson wrote: