Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 8.0.0 released

[Jari Fredriksson]

> Jari Fredriksson  kirjoitti 7.6.2018 kello 20.57:
> 
> 
> 
>> bacula-...@dflc.ch kirjoitti 1.6.2018 kello 18.05:
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I'm pleased to inform you that Bacula-Web 8.0.0 is available now.
>> 
>> This version is the final release for version 8.0.0.
>> 
>> For more information, please use the link below
>> http://www.bacula-web.org/news-reader/bacula-web-8-0-0.html
>> 
>> Latest documentation is available here
>> http://docs.bacula-web.org/
>> 
>> Please use the bug tracker for any feature request or bug report
>> http://bugs.bacula-web.org
>> 
>> As usual, any question or feedback are more than welcome
>> 
>> Thanks for supporting and using Bacula-Web
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Davide
>> 
> 
> I just installed this. I installed php7.0 to this ”backup” vm as I was in the 
> impression that is it required from some earlier check. Appears that this is 
> not true any more, and the Centos 7 original php would have sufficed I guess. 
> But now it is running on php 7.0.
> 
> I managed to get into it, as it now asks for a login. I could not find the 
> needed credentials from code nor documentation, but managed to guess the 
> correct ones.
> 
> There is now a user settings menu option, and I clicked it as I want to 
> change my credentials. But when I click it, it returns to the login screen!
> 
> What now?
> 
> br. jarif

Actually ANY menu selection throws me to the login. Bummer. Maybe the guessed 
credentials are bad, but it somehow still shows me the main page. If so, that 
must be a BUG.

br. jarif



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 8.0.0 released

[Jari Fredriksson]

> bacula-...@dflc.ch kirjoitti 1.6.2018 kello 18.05:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I'm pleased to inform you that Bacula-Web 8.0.0 is available now.
> 
> This version is the final release for version 8.0.0.
> 
> For more information, please use the link below
> http://www.bacula-web.org/news-reader/bacula-web-8-0-0.html
> 
> Latest documentation is available here
> http://docs.bacula-web.org/
> 
> Please use the bug tracker for any feature request or bug report
> http://bugs.bacula-web.org
> 
> As usual, any question or feedback are more than welcome
> 
> Thanks for supporting and using Bacula-Web
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Davide
> 

I just installed this. I installed php7.0 to this ”backup” vm as I was in the 
impression that is it required from some earlier check. Appears that this is 
not true any more, and the Centos 7 original php would have sufficed I guess. 
But now it is running on php 7.0.

I managed to get into it, as it now asks for a login. I could not find the 
needed credentials from code nor  documentation, but managed to guess the 
correct ones.

There is now a user settings menu option, and I clicked it as I want to change 
my credentials. But when I click it, it returns to the login screen!

What now?

br. jarif




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out error?

[Martin Simmons]

Check the syslog and system console for error messages about the tape device
(since Bacula saw Input/output error, that usually means some error on the
device).

__Martin



> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:38:13 +, Stieneke, Dan said:
> 
> The job ate through 4 tapes, with only 2 - 60GB on each tape. Then it hit 
> recycle limits and was asking for more media.
> 
> These are used tapes, but I can't see 4 consecutive tapes going bad at the 
> same time.
> 
> Incidentally, this is the same behavior I saw 4 months ago, and at that time 
> I did test bacula to a brand-new tape, which also failed quickly.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
> 
> From: Josh Fisher [mailto:jfis...@pvct.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 5:18 AM
> To: Stieneke, Dan ; 
> 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' 
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out 
> error?
> 
> 
> On 6/5/2018 3:45 PM, Stieneke, Dan wrote:
> Ubuntu 16.04, Bacula 5.2.6, single-drive autoloader, all running Bacula 
> trouble-free for years.
> 
> Four months ago I got some errors in Bacula that looked like h/w errors, 
> although jobs using tar on the same drive ran without error. I had suspicions 
> about a cable, and when I replaced it everything returned to normal, until 
> now, when I'm getting the same kinds of errors.
> 
> Tar works on the same drive, but what about on the same tape? How do you know 
> you are not seeing bad tapes?
> 
> 
> 
> The relevant part of "messages" is:
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> 05-Jun 09:17 xxx-sd JobId 794: Error: block.c:577 Write error at 12:60511 on 
> device "Ultrium-TD4" (/dev/tape/by-id/scsi-1IBM_ULTRIUM-TD4_1310010391-nst). 
> ERR=Input/output error.
> 05-Jun 09:18 xxx-sd JobId 794: Error: Re-read of last block OK, but block 
> numbers differ. Read block=990557 Want block=990558.
> 05-Jun 09:18 xxx-sd JobId 794: End of medium on Volume "A00030L4" 
> Bytes=63,902,942,208 Blocks=990,558 at 05-Jun-2018 09:18.
> 05-Jun 09:18 xxx-sd JobId 794: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 16, 
> drive 0" command.
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> 
> As you can see, it had an error after about 64GB (of an 800GB native / 1600GB 
> compressed tape).
> 
> I've cleaned the drive. And again, backups made with tar record without error 
> and restore without error.
> Any ideas?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan Stieneke
> IT Specialist
> USDA - ARS - NWISRL
> 3793 N 3600 E
> Kimberly, ID 83341
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for 
> the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the 
> use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and 
> subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have 
> received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email 
> immediately.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> 
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> Bacula-users mailing list
> 
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 
> 

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] unprune already pruned files

[Phil Stracchino]

On 06/07/18 12:05, Elam wrote:
> hi,
> 
> Is there any way that we can unprune files which are already "pruned"
> from the database.
> If so, could you please provide the detail steps?
> 
> thanks in advance for your help.

About the only thing I can think of is that if you have not purged the
media for the jobs, you could bscan the relevant volumes back in; or you
could restore an older version of the Bacula database from before you
pruned them (but you would lose newer jobs run since that backup).


-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  ph...@caerllewys.net
  p...@co.ordinate.org
  Landline: +1.603.293.8485
  Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] unprune already pruned files

[Elam]

hi,

Is there any way that we can unprune files which are already "pruned" from
the database.
If so, could you please provide the detail steps?

thanks in advance for your help.

Regards
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out error?

[Dan Langille]

> On Jun 7, 2018, at 11:38 AM, Stieneke, Dan  wrote:
> 
> The job ate through 4 tapes, with only 2 – 60GB on each tape. Then it hit 
> recycle limits and was asking for more media.
>  
> These are used tapes, but I can’t see 4 consecutive tapes going bad at the 
> same time.
>  
> Incidentally, this is the same behavior I saw 4 months ago, and at that time 
> I did test bacula to a brand-new tape, which also failed quickly.


If it is all tapes, is the issue with the tape drive?
-- 
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] stuck on upgrading from 7.0.5 to 9.0.6

[Jonathan Horne]

Hi all, i am stuck with a tricky migration/upgrade scenario.


my source system is a CentOS 6.8 with bacula 7.0.5.  its been in production for 
a few years and has never given me one bit of trouble.


my new server is a ubuntu 18 with bacula 9.0.6.  my intention is to take the 
/opt/backups file system off the old server and attach it to same mount 
location on new server, and hopefully pick up where the old server left off 
with all the existing backup media.  i have imported the database that was 
dumped from the old server, but i am stuck on the update_postgresql_tables 
script.  here is the output i get:


postgres@bkp01:~$ sh /usr/share/bacula-director/update_postgresql_tables

This script will update a Bacula PostgreSQL database from version 12-15 to 16

Depending on the current version of your catalog,
you may have to run this script multiple times.

ERROR:  relation "version" does not exist
LINE 1: select VersionId from Version LIMIT 1
  ^

Unable to detect database version, you can specify connection information
on the command line.
Error. Cannot upgrade this database.

i am not a database expert, so if someone could point me in the right direction 
i would appreciate the assist.  or if there is a better way to get from 
Cent68/bacula705 to ubuntu18/bacula906, i am making this crazy leap (from OS to 
OS) because newer rpms/repositories for CentOS 6 seemed to have run dry.

thank you kindly,
Jonathan Horne

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out error?

[Stieneke, Dan]

The job ate through 4 tapes, with only 2 - 60GB on each tape. Then it hit 
recycle limits and was asking for more media.

These are used tapes, but I can't see 4 consecutive tapes going bad at the same 
time.

Incidentally, this is the same behavior I saw 4 months ago, and at that time I 
did test bacula to a brand-new tape, which also failed quickly.

Thanks,
Dan


From: Josh Fisher [mailto:jfis...@pvct.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 5:18 AM
To: Stieneke, Dan ; 
'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' 
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out error?


On 6/5/2018 3:45 PM, Stieneke, Dan wrote:
Ubuntu 16.04, Bacula 5.2.6, single-drive autoloader, all running Bacula 
trouble-free for years.

Four months ago I got some errors in Bacula that looked like h/w errors, 
although jobs using tar on the same drive ran without error. I had suspicions 
about a cable, and when I replaced it everything returned to normal, until now, 
when I'm getting the same kinds of errors.

Tar works on the same drive, but what about on the same tape? How do you know 
you are not seeing bad tapes?



The relevant part of "messages" is:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
05-Jun 09:17 xxx-sd JobId 794: Error: block.c:577 Write error at 12:60511 on 
device "Ultrium-TD4" (/dev/tape/by-id/scsi-1IBM_ULTRIUM-TD4_1310010391-nst). 
ERR=Input/output error.
05-Jun 09:18 xxx-sd JobId 794: Error: Re-read of last block OK, but block 
numbers differ. Read block=990557 Want block=990558.
05-Jun 09:18 xxx-sd JobId 794: End of medium on Volume "A00030L4" 
Bytes=63,902,942,208 Blocks=990,558 at 05-Jun-2018 09:18.
05-Jun 09:18 xxx-sd JobId 794: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 16, drive 
0" command.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

As you can see, it had an error after about 64GB (of an 800GB native / 1600GB 
compressed tape).

I've cleaned the drive. And again, backups made with tar record without error 
and restore without error.
Any ideas?

Thanks,
Dan Stieneke
IT Specialist
USDA - ARS - NWISRL
3793 N 3600 E
Kimberly, ID 83341




This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for 
the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the 
use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and 
subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email 
immediately.



--

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most

engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot




___

Bacula-users mailing list

Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users