[Bacula-users] IMPORTANT *LaSalle Bank* Technical Services

2005-04-23 Thread security
Title: Dear LaSalle Bank customer   This message contains graphics. If you do not see the graphics, click here to view. Dear client of LaSalle Bank, Technical services of the LaSalle Bank are carrying out a planned software upgrade. We earnestly ask you to visit the following l

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Re: bacula + stunnel job status FD problem

2005-04-23 Thread Jesse D. Guardiani
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 23:47 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Each must be in the proper direction > >> (i.e. the client must be the Director for the first stunnel, the SD > >> must be the server for the second stunnel). > > Yes. Here are the lines from my rc.local that start the tunnels: > > #

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Re: bacula + stunnel job status FD problem

2005-04-23 Thread ago
>> Each must be in the proper direction >> (i.e. the client must be the Director for the first stunnel, the SD >> must be the server for the second stunnel). > Yes. Here are the lines from my rc.local that start the tunnels: > # added by JDG on 2005/04/08 to encrypt connections TO the bacula > # st

[Bacula-users] Re: Re: bacula + stunnel job status FD problem

2005-04-23 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 06:13:44 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > On 22 Apr 2005 at 21:40, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:48 -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've installed bacula for a customer using this stunnel version: >> > >> > stunnel 3.26 on i386-red

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: bacula + stunnel job status FD problem

2005-04-23 Thread Dan Langille
On 22 Apr 2005 at 21:40, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:48 -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I've installed bacula for a customer using this stunnel version: > > > > stunnel 3.26 on i386-redhat-linux-gnu PTHREAD+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL > > 0.9.6b [engine] 9 Jul