On Thursday 07 December 2006 22:11, Benjamin Chambers wrote:
>
> Bacula version 1.38.9/1.38.11 with MySQL
>
> I would very much appreciate it if anyone could clarify an issue that has
come
> up while attempting to restore from a bootstrap file.
>
> The question is actually fundamentally quite
On 12/7/06, Michael Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, December 6, 2006 11:21 am, John Drescher said:
>
> > I am using gmail and I believe there is no global way to do that
> > however I believe it sends both text and html in the same message. Am
> > I wrong? This message I clicked text on
On Wed, December 6, 2006 11:21 am, John Drescher said:
> I am using gmail and I believe there is no global way to do that
> however I believe it sends both text and html in the same message. Am
> I wrong? This message I clicked text only but I know I will forget on
> other messages. Sorry
How abo
Thanks for your reply Arno...
*If* it is a bug, it has crept in between 1.36.2 and 1.38.9 releases. I just
confirmed that the restore goes fine (ie. both tests work as expected) on a
1.36.2 install. Taking the exact same config files (provided), a 1.38.9
release
fails with the same message
Hi,
On 12/7/2006 10:11 PM, Benjamin Chambers wrote:
> Bacula version 1.38.9/1.38.11 with MySQL
>
> I would very much appreciate it if anyone could clarify an issue that has
> come
> up while attempting to restore from a bootstrap file.
>
> The question is actually fundamentally quite simple...
Bacula version 1.38.9/1.38.11 with MySQL
I would very much appreciate it if anyone could clarify an issue that has come
up while attempting to restore from a bootstrap file.
The question is actually fundamentally quite simple...Can a BSR file be used to
perform a restore if you have the boostr
On Thursday 07 December 2006 21:03, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> > On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:20, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> >> Hey there,
> >>
> >> we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
> >> a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 Jun
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:20, Rudolph Bott wrote:
>> Hey there,
>>
>> we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
>> a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) )
>>
>> We use file-backed backups and we have configured 6
Any thoughts on this scenario? I'm not sure that a quick answer exists.
I'd like to have bacula back up our collection of hosts to it's
file-based pool, so that we can browse backups "online" and restore
individual files quickly.
I'd also like to have a complete off-site copy of the pool for d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Simmons wrote:
>>> Actually to give credit where it is due, Martin supplied the patch (many
>>> thanks). I forget if he sent an email or a submitted a bug report, but if
>>> I
>>> remember right his fix was for 1.38.11, but since 1.39.x is s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Read the manual regarding this. You're missing a "Maximum Concurrent
Jobs" statement, though I couldn't swear whether it goes under Storage
or under Device. That should get you started, however. BTW, you should
really upgrade that FD -- Bacula is not d
I think this may be a permission problem. Check your
permissions on both sides.
ZK
--- Jon Ingason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed new bacula server 1.38.11 on debian
> testing/unstable
> runnig on PC and one of the clients, running on
> FreeBSD 6.1 version
> 1.38.5_1, is giving
Jon Ingason wrote:
I have installed new bacula server 1.38.11 on debian testing/unstable
runnig on PC and one of the clients, running on FreeBSD 6.1 version
1.38.5_1, is giving me problem:
run job="client-100" fileset="client File Set" level=Incremental
client="client-100-fd" pool="client-100" w
Gilbert Gondard
Equipe des installateurs Scribe pour les collèges du Loiret (France 45)
.
Bonjour,
Pour ceux qui ne connaissent pas, Scribe est un controleur de domaine et un
serveur de fichiers développé sous une Mandrake 9.1 par une équipe de
l'académie de Dijon. Cette équipe y a intégré Bacul
I've noticed that bacula (1.38.11) reports that the same media is in different
pools at the same time, with "stat stor" and "stat clients" giving the wrong
information.
For example, I've included output from "stat clients" (below, edited). Note the
pool names in the section "Running Jobs", wher
--On Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 15:28 +0100 Jon Ingason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed new bacula server 1.38.11 on debian testing/unstable
> runnig on PC and one of the clients, running on FreeBSD 6.1 version
> 1.38.5_1, is giving me problem:
>
> run job="client-100" fileset="
--On Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 8:17 Uhr -0500 John Drescher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Sebastian Hegewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> hey,
>>
>> i have 3 questions.
>>
>> 1. delivers the FD the backupdata straight to the SD or uses he the
>> detour over the Director?
> The fd
I have installed new bacula server 1.38.11 on debian testing/unstable
runnig on PC and one of the clients, running on FreeBSD 6.1 version
1.38.5_1, is giving me problem:
run job="client-100" fileset="client File Set" level=Incremental
client="client-100-fd" pool="client-100" when="2006-12-07 12:59
> > 2. is it possible to write a backup of one client simultaneously to
> > different Storages Devices, so that the backup is distributed?
> >
> Yes.
>
The only problem right now is that you have to run more than one job
for this to happen and thus the if there are changes to the filesystem
during
On 12/7/06, Sebastian Hegewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey,
>
> i have 3 questions.
>
> 1. delivers the FD the backupdata straight to the SD or uses he the detour
> over the Director?
The fd sends data to the sd.
>
> 2. is it possible to write a backup of one client simultaneously to
> differ
I have used Acronis in the Windows environment and can give some insight
into its operation.
Firstly I would like to say that I think it is a very good disaster
recover solution for a single server/workstation.
It is not designed for backing up to tape and is not ideal for backing
up to DVD.
hey,
i have 3 questions.
1. delivers the FD the backupdata straight to the SD or uses he the detour
over the Director?
2. is it possible to write a backup of one client simultaneously to
different Storages Devices, so that the backup is distributed?
3. is it possible to run bacula over a infin
On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:20, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
> a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) )
>
> We use file-backed backups and we have configured 6 different storages
> (from
Hey there,
we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) )
We use file-backed backups and we have configured 6 different storages
(from monday to saturday):
Device "StorageMontag" (/bacula/montag/montag-XX
On Thursday 07 December 2006 10:31, Anders Trobäck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> new to this list so bare with me!
>
> I have some directors to monitor and on my desktop I'm using
> bacula-tray-monitor. In the monitor I always get an error on my
> directors:
>
> "You must specify a "use " command before con
Hi,
new to this list so bare with me!
I have some directors to monitor and on my desktop I'm using
bacula-tray-monitor. In the monitor I always get an error on my
directors:
"You must specify a "use " command before continuing."
What have I missed and how can I satisfy my directors?
Thanks!!!
Georg Altmann wrote (2006/12/06):
> Actually cleaning is even harmful to the drive's heads. You should _never_
> clean an LTO drive unless it requests a cleaning tape, as indicated by
> front LED, Tape Alert or whatever.
Hello, just small additions:
HP LTO3 (and I believe that other recent tape
27 matches
Mail list logo
