James Harper wrote:
Another update: I found out that the database is in fact in a Dirty
Shutdown state (eseutil.exe told me that) - hence it won't work
(mount).
I found a discussion about this here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30912.
Silver Salonen wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009 02:07:58 terryc wrote:
Silver Salonen wrote:
Eg. if we want to do ordinary Grandfather-Father-Son rotation, we
create 3 different pools for every job - for full, differential and
incremental backups.
That is not how I understand GFS system,
Update: I think I found a restore setup that actually restores the
backup. The backup gets cut short when the DB is activated in Exchange
and this also crashes the Bacula FD on the target machine.
The end is Error: HrESERestoreComplete failed
with error 0xc7ff1004 - Unknown error. at
I'm not sure how the Exchange plugin works here. Since you are talking
about backing up/restoring the database *file*, the Exchange plugin
may
not even figure in the picture, doesn't that provide a mailbox-level
backup?
Assuming that the Exchange plugin is not part of the picture, what you
Tom Sommer wrote:
Okay, I added 12GB more RAM. Made my mysql tmp directory a tmpfs. Stole
some settings from Jason's my.cnf. Upgraded to latest MySQL version.
This seem to have done the trick. My FULL backup only took 7 hours
today, and completed without problems.
Sadly my director daemon
Silver Salonen wrote:
On Thursday 25 June 2009 19:41:10 John Drescher wrote:
There is no such limit. If you want more than one pool to write
concurrently have more than 1 storage device. With disks you can have
as many as you want. They can all point to the same physical storage
location.
I
Hi, my first post!
I have a Dell Powervault 124T and I believe a Certance Tape drive (LTO-2), the
Server is running Gentoo with Kernel 2.6.29-gentoo-r5 and Bacula 2.4.1-r1.
Below is the latter part of a btape fill single tape, which ends in a MTWEOF
error, I assume this is something I need to
On Friday 26 June 2009 09:38:37 Tom Sommer wrote:
Tom Sommer wrote:
Okay, I added 12GB more RAM. Made my mysql tmp directory a tmpfs. Stole
some settings from Jason's my.cnf. Upgraded to latest MySQL version.
This seem to have done the trick. My FULL backup only took 7 hours
today, and
i remember that i have problems with mt and mtx after upgrading to lenny,
something causes problems with their output and the mtx-changer script.
e.g. update slots needs to run twice in most cases
now i'm using self compiled version of mt and mtx
and everything works just like expected.
terryc
Hi again,
2009/6/22 Frank Altpeter frank.altpe...@gmail.com:
2009/6/22 c.kesch...@internet-mit-iq.de:
You could just give one server a lower priority. It would then run after all
other Jobs. The default is 10 (11 for the catalog), so Priority = 12 in the
Job Resource will make it run later.
Frank Altpeter frank.altpe...@gmail.com wrote on 26.06.2009 11:20:06:
Frank Altpeter frank.altpe...@gmail.com
26.06.2009 11:20
An
c.kesch...@internet-mit-iq.de
Kopie
Thema
Re: [Bacula-users] How to prevent two clients to run at the same time
Hi again,
2009/6/22 Frank
I do this every single day at home. 5 jobs concurrently write to the
same exact volume.
My original claim was made in the context of disk-based backups (ie. multiple
pools as I explained in the same message). Using the same exact volume (or
pool) with disk-based backup-system is quite a big
How urgent is it to get this fixed?
As far as I can tell you are doing everything right... I'll look up
those error messages.
James
I disabled the ntbackup schedule to make sure I got a 'clean' full
backup and the result is the same. I have no log files because of the
full backup
Op 06/26/09 03:17, James Harper schreef:
Another update: I found out that the database is in fact in a Dirty
Shutdown state (eseutil.exe told me that) - hence it won't work
(mount).
I found a discussion about this here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30912.
Op 06/26/09 14:45, James Harper schreef:
How urgent is it to get this fixed?
As far as I can tell you are doing everything right... I'll look up
those error messages.
James
I disabled the ntbackup schedule to make sure I got a 'clean' full
backup and the result is the same. I have no log
There's been an interesting thread about the limitations of the
storage/device model in Bacula, and i think i'm hitting one of those
limitations, or maybe a configuration error:
I have 1 Storage daemon with 1 File device, 1 autochanger with 1 Tape
device.
I want to make concurrent backups to
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jose E. Molinajmol...@brujula.es wrote:
There's been an interesting thread about the limitations of the
storage/device model in Bacula, and i think i'm hitting one of those
limitations, or maybe a configuration error:
I have 1 Storage daemon with 1 File
On Friday 26 June 2009 10:07:46 terryc wrote:
Silver Salonen wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009 02:07:58 terryc wrote:
Silver Salonen wrote:
Eg. if we want to do ordinary Grandfather-Father-Son rotation, we
create 3 different pools for every job - for full, differential and
incremental
Silver Salonen wrote:
Um.. we have different basics of our discussion - you use tapes, I use disks,
so I expect Bacula to handle volumes and pools differently than in your case.
Irelevant, really. If you are running a backup system, you essentially
handle them the same way; as rotated
Andreas,
This really depends on your configuration. If you have only one drive
head, you should set
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 6 (or any number your want)
in your job definitions. If you have multiple drive i/o heads, you have
to also configure your job definition to prefer mounted volumes to
Hello all,
to get to know more users of Bacula and allow us to actually meet fact
to face, everybody using Bacula or interested in it is invited:
Tomorrow, June 27th
Starting 20:00
Location: Bar / Restaurant AndaLuca, Savignyplatz 2, Berlin
Bacula Systems sponsoring drinks (some limitation ;-)
Thanks Martin,
You have put a good closure on the quest for knowledge. If I upgrade Bacula,
will I have to upgrade the database? Meaning do I have to run those update
table scripts. I am on postgresql version 8.29.
Yudhvir
OK, this shows why it is slow. The algorithm in add_findex is only
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:26 -0700, mehma sarja said:
Thanks Martin,
You have put a good closure on the quest for knowledge. If I upgrade Bacula,
will I have to upgrade the database? Meaning do I have to run those update
table scripts. I am on postgresql version 8.29.
Sorry, I don't
Some additional info: btape also does not know what to do with the next
tape:
Wrote blk_block=159, dev_blk_num=2930 VolBytes=416,808,697,856
rate=60990.4 KB/s
Wrote blk_block=1595000, dev_blk_num=302 VolBytes=418,119,417,856
rate=61003.7 KB/s
Wrote blk_block=160, dev_blk_num=1488
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.uswrote:
I've set-up a migration job to migrate jobs from one set of tape volumes to
disk volumes. I've configured the destination pool to use the volume once
and have a retention period of 2 months. For some reason when the
25 matches
Mail list logo
