[Bacula-users] Windows client firewalling problem

2009-12-07 Thread Kevin Keane
I recently upgraded my bacula from 2.4 to 3.0. Almost everything works beautifully, except for one Windows 2008 Standard client machine (64 version). This machine is running the 64-bit version of winbacula 3.0.2. The directory and SD both are on other machines on the same subnet. The Windows

Re: [Bacula-users] Very slow interactive restore

2009-12-07 Thread Christoph Litauer
Christoph Litauer schrieb: Arno Lehmann schrieb: Hi, 24.11.2009 08:59, Christoph Litauer wrote: Christoph Litauer schrieb: Jesper Krogh schrieb: Christoph Litauer wrote: Thanks! One last question (hopefully): How big is /var/lib/mysql/ibdata1? 282GB on ext3 Dear Jesper, in the

[Bacula-users] 287GB data, 100MB/day, 2 weeks restore. Howto setup

2009-12-07 Thread Niklas Hagman
Hi Hi. I have a customer that has 287 GB of data that's needs to be backuped. The change of this data is probably around 100MB per day. The customer wants to be able to restore files 2 weeks back in time. How do I set this up so it requires so little space as possible? I was thinking about using

[Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread Oliver Knittel
Hello Together, I get the folloing message when I ask for the Status of Storage File Fatal error: bsock.c:135 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on backupsrv.ke-si.intern:9103. ERR=Connection refused DNS is correct Sever Name is checkt many times FQN is in hosts too. Password is proofed.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread John Drescher
I get the folloing message when I ask for the Status of Storage File Fatal error: bsock.c:135 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on backupsrv.ke-si.intern:9103. ERR=Connection refused DNS is correct Sever Name is checkt many times FQN is in hosts too. Password is proofed. When I use

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:56 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: I get the folloing message when I ask for the Status of Storage File Fatal error: bsock.c:135 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on backupsrv.ke-si.intern:9103. ERR=Connection refused DNS is correct Sever Name is

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 06:33:59AM -0800, Oliver Knittel wrote: Hello Together, I get the folloing message when I ask for the Status of Storage File Fatal error: bsock.c:135 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on backupsrv.ke-si.intern:9103. ERR=Connection refused DNS is correct Sever

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread Kevin Keane
Since telnet is refused, too, odds are that either there is a firewall involved, or the FQDN resolves to the wrong host. BTW, telnet failing is no longer always a reliable indicator of whether the firewall is configured correctly, since many firewalls have different rules on a per-application

[Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula TimeMachine type SOHOconfig?

2009-12-07 Thread Simon J Mudd
timo-n...@tee-en.net (Timo Neuvonen) writes: Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä ... Yes, but that's what I'm trying to avoid. I realise that I MUST have sufficient space really for at least 2 full backups plus some extra for incrementals but I don't want to worry about

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Oliver Knittel wrote: Hello Together, I get the folloing message when I ask for the Status of Storage File Fatal error: bsock.c:135 Unable to connect to Storage daemon on backupsrv.ke-si.intern:9103. ERR=Connection refused DNS is correct Sever Name is checkt many times FQN is in hosts

Re: [Bacula-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Bacula TimeMachinetype SOHOconfig?

2009-12-07 Thread Timo Neuvonen
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä news:m3fx7mkdv3@mad06.wl0.org... timo-n...@tee-en.net (Timo Neuvonen) writes: Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä ... Yes, but that's what I'm trying to avoid. I realise that I MUST have sufficient space really for

Re: [Bacula-users] estimating time remaining on a backup

2009-12-07 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:46:02 + Gavin McCullagh gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie wrote: Hi, I started a full backup last night of a tired old Windows-based Dell NAS. It's very slow. The filesystem is full and super-fragmented. I also have compression turned on which makes the cpu work rather hard

Re: [Bacula-users] 287GB data, 100MB/day, 2 weeks restore. Howto setup

2009-12-07 Thread James Harper
Hi. I have a customer that has 287 GB of data that's needs to be backuped. The change of this data is probably around 100MB per day. The customer wants to be able to restore files 2 weeks back in time. How do I set this up so it requires so little space as possible? I was thinking about

[Bacula-users] SOT: Better strategy for backup PostgreSQL DB

2009-12-07 Thread ReynierPM
Hi there: I'm trying to establishing I'm trying to establish the rules and guidelines to be followed by a Data Center (DC) on topics of backup and restore information. The software that I have proposed to perform these tasks is Bacula[1] of course. This is already configured and backing up

Re: [Bacula-users] SOT: Better strategy for backup PostgreSQL DB

2009-12-07 Thread Dan Langille
ReynierPM wrote: Hi there: I'm trying to establishing I'm trying to establish the rules and guidelines to be followed by a Data Center (DC) on topics of backup and restore information. The software that I have proposed to perform these tasks is Bacula[1] of course. This is already

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Problem Storage File

2009-12-07 Thread Oliver Knittel
Everything didnt work. now I install the Serve new and keep my config files. I will tell the result soon to you. Via telnet it was posible to get on the comp. now I changed the name from backuupsrv to backup. Oliver Knittel wrote: Hello Together, I get the folloing message when I ask

Re: [Bacula-users] 287GB data, 100MB/day, 2 weeks restore. Howto setup

2009-12-07 Thread Niklas Hagman
Thank you James for that answer. As I expected, 2 full backups seems to be needed to exist to be able to have 2 weeks possibility to restore. But what about this: (F = full, I= incremental. Day 1 to day 13.) F+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I Then merge the oldest incremental with the full one, creating