Hello,
I am new to bacula and have run successful backups with it but I am
encountering a nagging problem. I'm using bacula 2.2.8 on ubuntu 8.04lts. The
problem occurs with a daily backup not being able to run because the director
is unable to open the log file:
Error: message.c:590 fopen
I think I know the problem but I couldn't test it because my patients ended
with bacula and I erased all tapes and deleted the volumes for relabeling. I
discovered I have to update a volume to remove it from the pool when it is
removed from the library. It looks like I cannot simply update slo
On 02/25/10 04:01 AM, Jeronimo Zucco wrote:
> Thanks for your tip. I've created the index as mentioned in the
> thread, but my restores still very slow. I'm not using accurate backups.
>
> May be I have to migrate from mysql to postgres, my database are
> MyISAM with 60 gb of data. Or else do
Thanks for your tip. I've created the index as mentioned in the
thread, but my restores still very slow. I'm not using accurate backups.
May be I have to migrate from mysql to postgres, my database are
MyISAM with 60 gb of data. Or else downgrade back to 3.0.3 version.
Any other tip ?
b
Any comments? Am I completely off base?
David
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:22:59 pm David Koski wrote:
> Please comment on this strategy. Does it look reasonable? Any caveats?
>
> I have installed bacula and configured the director, storage and file
> daemons. My strategy is to have two pool
Greetings,
Please forgive my ignorance, but it's been years since I used Bacula and
that was on a linux box.
I'm running 3.03 on windows 2003 SP2 using local disk storage. I have
created a daily schedule but every client fails w/ a fatal error. If I
run a backup for a client manually it work
Greetings!
I'm relatively new to Bacula, and am working on my first deployment. I am
working in a completely disk-based environment, so I have a single director and
SD which run on the same host, and a few Windows test server clients which run
FD's.
Because it's all disk based, I'm using comp
Been struggling with a difficult restore for a few days now, and need some help
please.
The short story is that I am trying to recover files from a disk archive which
was
subsequently deleted from disk, and then recovered using an undelete process on
a
reiserfs disk. Most of the files appear to
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 19:28:05 John Drescher wrote:
> > If volumes were files, there wouldn't be any need to limit them for
devices
> > which would be directories in that context.
> >
>
> Again the limit is only 1 volume can be loaded in 1 storage device at
> a time. This is not that big
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 02/24/10 08:07, Silver Salonen wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>>>
>>> I ran into this
On 02/24/10 08:07, Silver Salonen wrote:
> BTW, this part is very obscure in the manual:
> "if you want two different jobs to run simultaneously backing up the same
> Client to the same Storage device, they will run concurrently only if you
> have
> set Maximum Concurrent Jobs greater than one i
2010/2/24 Oliver Knittel :
> Hello together,
>
>
>
> how can I unsubscribe the list?
>
Follow the link at the bottom of every email.
John
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. S
On 02/24/10 08:07, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
>>> I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>>
>> I ran into this problem when I first upgraded to 3.0.3. It turned out
>> to be
Hello together,
how can I unsubscribe the list?
Thanks for your help.
Nutzen Sie staatliche Förderungen! Informationen finden Sie unter:
http://wegebau.scsi.de
SCSI Schulungscenter GmbH
Widmaierstraße 110
70567 Stuttgart
Tel: +49 711 94941-05
Fax: +49 711 94941-95
http://www.scsi.de
Geschäft
On 2/24/2010 12:03 PM, Administrator wrote:
> Hi,
> i use two simple usb-disks for backups. Each friday the aktive disk is
> exchanged and put in safe. Alas bacula asks me always to bring the last
> used volume online or label a new one. Labeling a new one solves the
> problem but this is not a go
> If volumes were files, there wouldn't be any need to limit them for devices
> which would be directories in that context.
>
Again the limit is only 1 volume can be loaded in 1 storage device at
a time. This is not that big of a limitation because with disk you
can have 1 storage devices if
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 17:03:58 Josh Fisher wrote:
> On 2/24/2010 9:25 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > It's like assuming that the "ultimate" backup-devices are tapes. And as I
> > don't think that way, it's so annoying these design decisions rely on
> > somebody's (emotional/historical) opini
Hi,
On 02/24/10 05:03 PM, Jeronimo Zucco wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I'm trying to do some restores in my setup, but after I've upgraded
> to 5.0.0 version, the restore take a very, very long time in "Building
> directory tree for JobId...", even in small sets of files.
>
> I was using
Hi,
i use two simple usb-disks for backups. Each friday the aktive disk is
exchanged and put in safe. Alas bacula asks me always to bring the last
used volume online or label a new one. Labeling a new one solves the
problem but this is not a good solution, as it involves manual
interaction and
Hey,
I created some clients which I don't need anymore. When running a job I
can't select them, running restore shows them thought. "select * from
Client;" shows the entries in the database. Is it safe to remove them?
dbcheck didn't report any orphaned clients which is strange.
Chris
--
Hi,
> --- Originalnachricht ---
> Von: Ralf Gross
> An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Gesendet: 23.2.10, 23.02
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Can't restore a file. Might have an issuewith
> my mysql DB.
>
> Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 23.02.2010 14:05, jch2os wro
Am 18.2.2010 14:29, schrieb Arno Lehmann:
> Hi,
>
> 18.02.2010 11:51, Administrator wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> i tried to setup Bacula 5 according to the "main" Manual with different
>> Pools for servers, clients, full and incremental. I backup to a USB-disk
>> on OpenSUSE 11.1 64.
>> The status ma
Hello,
Janusz Syrytczyk wrote :
On Monday 14 December 2009 09:27:40 Bruno Friedmann wrote:
On 12/09/2009 12:11 AM, Janusz Syrytczyk wrote:
Hi,
I've upgraded to 3.0.3 from 3.0.2 a while ago and I'm facing serious
problems with bacula-dir stability.
Just after its start, Director is able to
Hi list.
I'm trying to do some restores in my setup, but after I've upgraded
to 5.0.0 version, the restore take a very, very long time in "Building
directory tree for JobId...", even in small sets of files.
I was using 3.0.3 version, and the restore was very fast.
Follow be
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:29:54 -0800 schrieb David Koski:
> > I am trying to recycle some tapes that have become used. I have set the
> > status to append:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I have tried to stop and start the jobs and restart bacula without
> >
Hello List,
I am using Bacula 3.0.3 in conjunction with a 4 drive autochanger and
"Prefer Mounted Volumes" set to "No." Unfortunately, I have had a number
of problems with Bacula trying to back up to a volume that is already
being used for another job. As a result, the job will continue to wait
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:58:57 John Drescher wrote:
>> > OK. I have never used tapes with Bacula. But I'd expect a file-type device
> to
>> > be able to load more than 1 volume at a time. It's quite trivial, isn't
> it?
>> >
>> This
On 2/24/2010 9:25 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:58:57 John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> OK. I have never used tapes with Bacula. But I'd expect a file-type device
>>>
> to
>
>>> be able to load more than 1 volume at a time. It's quite trivial, isn't
>>>
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 16:42:50 John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > What's the use of treating all the devices the same way anyway? Ease of
> > programming? Even though it makes this part of the whole project so rigid?
> >
>
> Ease of programmi
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:58:57 John Drescher wrote:
> > OK. I have never used tapes with Bacula. But I'd expect a file-type device
to
> > be able to load more than 1 volume at a time. It's quite trivial, isn't
it?
> >
> This was a design decision that all devices are treated the same way.
> Are you saying that for concurrent jobs to work I have to run these different
> jobs into the same volume? It doesn't make any sense in the means of disk-
> based backups.
>
If they are not the same volume then you need to have more than 1
storage device. Remember that only 1 volume can be loade
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:34:27 John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
> >> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
> >> > I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>
> OK. I have never used tapes with Bacula. But I'd expect a file-type device to
> be able to load more than 1 volume at a time. It's quite trivial, isn't it?
>
This was a design decision that all devices are treated the same way.
>
> Anyway, the "1 volume at a time"-limit has always been "one job
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
>> > I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>>
>> I ran into this problem when I first upgraded to 3.0.3. It tur
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>
> I ran into this problem when I first upgraded to 3.0.3. It turned out
> to be a configuration issue. Make sure you have th
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 13:38:17 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:58:22 +0200, Silver Salonen said:
> > No, the default for devices has always been to allow only 1 job.
>
> That's not correct. Bacula has always been able to run multiple concurrent
> jobs to the same devi
> Yes, the problem is there, I correct it yesterday.. the volumes don't
> exceed the 'volumes retention', so the aren't ready to recicle
>
> But the question is... why it works well for 3 month?? :-)
>
Did you change the retention in bacula after using some volumes?
Do you know that the retention
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:58:22 +0200, Silver Salonen said:
>
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 20:45:26 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > I think you have the concept backwards -- it is designed to prevent
> > concurrency on that device rather than allowing more of it.
> >
> > The default allows an unlim
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>
> I ran into this problem when I first upgraded to 3.0.3. It turned out
> to be a configuration issue. Make sure you have th
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 20:45:26 Martin Simmons wrote:
> I think you have the concept backwards -- it is designed to prevent
> concurrency on that device rather than allowing more of it.
>
> The default allows an unlimited number of jobs to be queued (or run
> concurrently on a single volume).
I am struggling a bit with the wildcard stuff.
I want to back up all Mail directories in the homedirectories of users,
so /home/*/Mail (including subdirs) needs to be backed up.
In order to take a more generic approach I tried the wild card stuff,
but or nothing gets backed up, or everything.
So
>
> Do you currently have 21 volumes in use?
>
Yes, the problem is there, I correct it yesterday.. the volumes don't
exceed the 'volumes retention', so the aren't ready to recicle
But the question is... why it works well for 3 month?? :-)
BHO
Another question, when the SD stops waiting for a Vo
Am Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:30:31 +0100 schrieb Markus Heinze:
> Hello List,
>
> im new to bacula and i have a simple problem, i think. I wan't to backup
> a few directories to a tape only from monday to friday. i only hav 5
> tapes (currently) so i have one tape for each day, so i must overwrite
> ea
43 matches
Mail list logo
