Hi folks
I've recently been saddled with a win2k8 server, and am trying to figure
out how to make it play with my backup infrastructure.
Currently I've got it doing scheduled backups via Windows Server Backup
to an iSCSI volume exported by my backup server. In case the setup is of
interest to
On 05/ 5/10 08:11 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Hi folks
I've recently been saddled with a win2k8 server, and am trying to figure
out how to make it play with my backup infrastructure.
Currently I've got it doing scheduled backups via Windows Server Backup
to an iSCSI volume exported by my backup
On 05/05/10 14:38, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 05/ 5/10 08:11 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Hi folks
I've recently been saddled with a win2k8 server, and am trying to figure
out how to make it play with my backup infrastructure.
Currently I've got it doing scheduled backups via Windows Server
On 05/ 5/10 09:32 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 05/05/10 14:38, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 05/ 5/10 08:11 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Hi folks
I've recently been saddled with a win2k8 server, and am trying to figure
out how to make it play with my backup infrastructure.
Currently I've got it doing
On 04/05/10 13:51, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Am Tue, 04 May 2010 08:34:15 +0200 schrieb Vlamsdoem:
Hello,
I have few questions about my new backup configuration. Before asking my
questions I will give you some useful information about what I need to
do.
I need a backup ± 10 servers with
Hi.
I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
what is a way to backup a shared partition?
If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster nodes, that when
storage is mounted on another node,
Sorry my servers are on gigabit links.
How do you come to 9MB/s with a 100Mb link, is it not equals to 12,5 MB/s?
Overhead.
If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s
You will probably get less than that if you do not use jumbo frames.
and the transfer rate of
and the transfer rate of the sata disks are 3Gb/s(375MB/s).
No way are your SATA drives that fast. More likely 1/4 to 1/3 of that
speed unless all servers are using high end SSDs.
I forgot to mention that this ~100MB/s is only for large sequential
reads. When reads get small or random the
Hi.
I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
what is a way to backup a shared partition?
If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster nodes, that
when
storage is mounted on
On 05/05/10 08:38, John Drescher wrote:
Sorry my servers are on gigabit links.
How do you come to 9MB/s with a 100Mb link, is it not equals to 12,5 MB/s?
Overhead.
If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s
You will probably get less than that if you do not
On 05/05/10 08:16, Jakov Sosic wrote:
Hi.
I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
what is a way to backup a shared partition?
If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster nodes,
--- On Wed, 5/5/10, Stefan Muenkner stefan.muenk...@uks.eu wrote:
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com
wrote:
The suspense was killing me, so I went ahead and
modified the scripts from the source installation to work
here. I now have a mysql 'bacula' database.
On 04.05.2010 20:32, Joseph Spenner wrote:
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Installing with RPMs
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 11:29 AM
--- On Tue,
On 5/5/2010 8:16 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
Hi.
I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
what is a way to backup a shared partition?
If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster nodes,
If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s
...
and the transfer rate of the sata disks are 3Gb/s(375MB/s).
...
No way are your SATA drives that fast. More likely 1/4 to 1/3 of that
If the link is 90 MB/s and drives deliver 1/4 of 375 MB/s(94 MB/s) - that's
a
No way are your SATA drives that fast. More likely 1/4 to 1/3 of that
If the link is 90 MB/s and drives deliver 1/4 of 375 MB/s(94 MB/s) - that's
a throughput of about 90 MB/s. That's a whopping speed of 324 GB/hr. You
must be going through a fiber switch to a striped array of sorts.
Agreed.
On Wed, 05 May 2010 15:18:08 +0200, Stefan Muenkner said:
On 04.05.2010 20:32, Joseph Spenner wrote:
--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Installing with RPMs
To:
I am trying to build 5.0.2 BAT on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.6 system using
the source RPM. The build starts fine, but midway through runs into trouble
with
In file included from main.cpp:36:
bat.h:44:17: QtGui: No such file or directory
In file included from mainwin.h:41,
I am also using W2K8 and back up with Windows Backup to an iSCSI server.
There really is no good way around Windows backup (unless you want a paid
solution). W2K8 relies heavily on junction points, which bacula doesn't back
up. BTW, if you are using Exchange 2007, be sure to install SP2 -
On 05/05/2010 04:13 PM, Josh Fisher wrote:
I think it will have to be a cluster service. The FD has to be available
at the same IP, same client name, etc., else how will Bacula know it is
the same FD?
I don't know - because I have some experience with backing up shared
storage with Tivoli
I am also using W2K8 and back up with Windows Backup to an iSCSI
server.
There really is no good way around Windows backup (unless you want a
paid
solution). W2K8 relies heavily on junction points, which bacula
doesn't back
up. BTW, if you are using Exchange 2007, be sure to install SP2 -
21 matches
Mail list logo
