On 21/07/10, Craig Miskell (craig.misk...@opus.co.nz) wrote:
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
On 19/07/10, Rory Campbell-Lange (r...@campbell-lange.net) wrote:
I ran a full backup of a volume last week on Bacula v2.4.4 and I
have now upgraded to 5.0.2. I'm getting half the throughput last
On 21/07/10 03:27, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 07/20/10 10:15, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been reading up on some of the new features, and one of them is a
base job. Do I need to do an actual full backup to create a base, or can
I make one from existing backed up data?
You cannot,
Please excuse the attached txt, but putting it on pastebin doesn't last
forever
In this setup, if I update the file set, the backup begins again as a
FULL backup. This why would this be the case?
Ran TESTBASE, to create the basejob - no errors
Ran TESTJOB, to see if anything else will be
Hi list,
I'm using bacula-5.0.2 with a disk storage and a Tandberg 24-tape
changer system to backup about 130 server systems. The intention was
to do a disk based full backup once a week and afterwards copy these
full backups on tape. Currently, I'm using three storage devices
(FileStorage,
I am running v5.0.2 against some clients with many files (5-10
million). I have and want the fileset option of accurate=mcs5 (md5
checks) when I do a full backup of the clients. However I DO NOT want
to do a md5 check when I do differentials/incremental's due to the fact
that it takes
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:38:36 +1200, Craig Miskell said:
Alex Chekholko wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:11:49 +1200
Craig Miskell craig.misk...@opus.co.nz wrote:
Hi,
It looks like I need to beef up Maximum Block Size to get good
performance out of our LTO-4 tape drives.
I recently posted here that I had written a Xymon script to monitor Bacula.
The script basically uses the bconsole program to run a status dir followed
by a list jobs, like so:
echo status dir | /usr/sbin/bconsole
(do some grepping etc)
followed by
echo list jobs | /usr/sbin/bconsole
(do some
Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
As for the forking: I have that same issue, every Mail has the same subject
but I don't think you can change that (I might be wrong).
Hi list,
I'm using bacula-5.0.2 with a disk
Hello!
I want to be sure if have understand the periods and there relationship
to a possible restore.
The file retention period define the possibility to restore files over
the given period. If i have the following schedule, how do i have to set
the retention periods to have always two full sets
Hi,
2010/7/21 c.kesch...@internet-mit-iq.de:
Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that is
needed) and put it on pastebin here:
Hi all,
We make backups of about 200 server at the moment, to disk. Twice a week
a Full backup and 5 times a week an incremental. Every day is a
different pool, so the tape drives won't interfere with the backup to
disk and vice versa. We write the data to tape using a copy job.
The tapes have a
On 07/21/10 09:26, Enrico van Goor wrote:
Hi all,
We make backups of about 200 server at the moment, to disk. Twice a week
a Full backup and 5 times a week an incremental. Every day is a
different pool, so the tape drives won't interfere with the backup to
disk and vice versa. We write the
On 7/21/2010 8:39 AM, Alex Huth wrote:
Hello!
I want to be sure if have understand the periods and there relationship
to a possible restore.
The file retention period define the possibility to restore files over
the given period. If i have the following schedule, how do i have to set
the
Bacula is asking for a volume that is no longer in the changer because it was
marked as full and sent offsite. As you can see the volume was last written to
on July 9th.
Current snippet for this volume 'list media pool=Offsite' below.
103 | KL0451 | Append| 1 | 163,962,667,008 |
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
jj...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Bacula is asking for a volume that is no longer in the changer because it was
marked as full and sent offsite. As you can see the volume was last written
to on July 9th.
Current snippet for this volume 'list
Are you using a separate volume per job? In that case, you could simply forego
a copy job altogether and just copy the disk files themselves. 100 years from
now, you may have a problem simply reading the database. So it may be easier
and better to just rely on the files themselves. Write a
John,
I have 4 pools total, two pools defined by me: Offsite and Onsite and two that
I believe are default to Bacula: Catalog and Scratch.
Offsite retention period is 6 months, Onsite is 3 months. Once a volume is
marked full from Onsite the volume goes on the shelf to the back of the stack.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:51:37 -0500, Steve Costaras said:
I am running v5.0.2 against some clients with many files (5-10
million). I have and want the fileset option of accurate=mcs5 (md5
checks) when I do a full backup of the clients. However I DO NOT want
to do a md5 check when I do
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:36:41 +0100, Mister IT Guru said:
Please excuse the attached txt, but putting it on pastebin doesn't last
forever
In this setup, if I update the file set, the backup begins again as a
FULL backup. This why would this be the case?
Ran TESTBASE, to create the
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:50:41 -0600, May, John said:
Monday morning, 3 days later and it is still restoring. It's finished about
600GB, which is less than half of what is on the two tapes. I'm pretty sure
that only one job was written to the tape at the time of backup. Also, I
thought
Please ignore this thread. It was early morning, and I had an issue with one
of the KDE konsoles I had opened at the time.
Typing reset at the shell prompt cleared up the problem within that terminal.
One of those mornings where three things seemingly unrelated we all going on
at once.
sigh...
As far as I know it was running at about 70MB/s. It could have been
shoe-shining a bit though, not really sure.
-John
-Original Message-
From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:26 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
I am looking at doing base jobs to help avoid tying up systems for too
long though until multi-threading for the FD arrives it's kind of moot
as it takes the same amount of time with large file sets.I use the
MD5 checks as a means to verify file integrity and to restore if a file
gets
23 matches
Mail list logo
