'Joseph L. Casale' wrote:
I have several physical and virtual fd's that are just unreliable to backup
against two sd/dir's all at 5.0.3 running CentOS5x64.
Anyone else having these issues? I get random network IO failures as
suggested by the dir?
We are seeing the same pattern - W28K boxes fail
All the machine backups go into one pool. It is counterproductive to use
individual pools for machines as that means tapes aren't filled
regularly and you're having to either keep lots in the changer or have
to change tapes constantly.
yes but, as I said in my first post, I'm not using
On 9/29/2010 4:48 AM, dobbin wrote:
All the machine backups go into one pool. It is counterproductive to use
individual pools for machines as that means tapes aren't filled
regularly and you're having to either keep lots in the changer or have
to change tapes constantly.
yes but, as I said
Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
Hi, List!
A new detail: the Jobs Run remains empty only if I run bat as the
Administrator. Running it as another user, it displays correctly.
So not a dll problem.
Is it a bug or a feature?
--
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy
I've had same problem...
try to
Hello Folks,
how can I exclude all NFS share mounted in randomly mount point ?
Thanks
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate
Hello list,
I've noticed event 12302 being reported on several Windows 2003 servers.
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: An internal inconsistency was detected in
trying to contact shadow copy service writers. Please check to see that the
Event Service and Volume Shadow Copy Service are
I'm looking for a query which gives
1: the total data backed up
2: the total bytes backed up
On a per-job basis.
Has anyone written this one already? (psql)
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:51:15PM +0200, Roberto Preziusi wrote:
Hello Folks,
how can I exclude all NFS share mounted in randomly mount point ?
Thanks
Hello Roberto,
there is a settings variable that tells bacula not to descend into
different file systems from the one it is currently
On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 20:19:25 Joseph L. Casale escribió:
Things were working well until recently so I am pretty sure an update to
the OS has probably caused this by breaking something for the FD software.
None of the similar hardware running Win2003 is affected.
Do you have a WSUS
Try with this option:
*onefs=yesno*If set to *yes* (the default), *Bacula* will remain on a single
file system. That is it will not backup file systems that are mounted on a
subdirectory. If you are using a *nix system, you may not even be aware that
there are several different filesystems as they
All,
I'm running Bacula 5.0.5, in combination with Mysql
Backup device: disk
tape-size : 20 Gb
Running a job, and when it want to change the volume because it is
full I got the following message.
Any sugestion?
Regards,
Eric
-- Forwarded message --
From: es...@indm.nl
Date:
sorry folks, that link seems to be dead, I wanted to point out the
onefs=yes|no
configuration option.
Cheers, Uwe
--
uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net fon: [+49] 5242.91 - 4740, fax:-69 72
Hauptsitz: Avenwedder Str. 55, D-33311 Gütersloh, Germany
Registergericht Gütersloh HRB 4196, Geschäftsführer:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:48 AM, dobbin bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
All the machine backups go into one pool. It is counterproductive to use
individual pools for machines as that means tapes aren't filled
regularly and you're having to either keep lots in the changer or have
to
Hello
I have now set up my first couple of backup jobs, both local and over
internet and it seems to bee working fine!! Quite happy about this since its
my first time using Bacula! However I have a couple of questions about
version control an recycling of volumes.
First a little info. I have 5
2010/9/29 Albin Vega albinv4...@gmail.com:
Hello
I have now set up my first couple of backup jobs, both local and over
internet and it seems to bee working fine!! Quite happy about this since its
my first time using Bacula! However I have a couple of questions about
version control an
I have a server with ext3 and ext2 local FS.
Bacula saves both FS with *onefs=yes *enabled ?
2010/9/29 Uwe Schuerkamp uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net
sorry folks, that link seems to be dead, I wanted to point out the
onefs=yes|no
configuration option.
Cheers, Uwe
--
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Roberto Preziusi wrote:
I have a server with ext3 and ext2 local FS.
Bacula saves both FS with *onefs=yes *enabled ?
If you have onefs enabled (which is the default I believe), bacula
will not cross fs boundaries, so if you have two filesystems, say
On 09/29/10 09:33, Roberto Preziusi wrote:
I have a server with ext3 and ext2 local FS.
Bacula saves both FS with *onefs=yes *enabled ?
OK, let's clarify this:
onefs = yes in a FileSet says Remain within one filesystem, do NOT
descend into other mounted filesystems.
onefs = no in a FileSet
On 9/29/2010 3:00 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
'Joseph L. Casale' wrote:
I have several physical and virtual fd's that are just unreliable to backup
against two sd/dir's all at 5.0.3 running CentOS5x64.
Anyone else having these issues? I get random network IO failures as
suggested by the di
Tell them to turn on TCP Keepalives on both sides (Linux its a
syssctl(8), WinNT by hacking random registry entries and setting them to
arbitrary and random values)
Up the TCP state expiration timeout values on any stateful L2/L3 devices
en route.
Not buying that, the default for Linux and
Hi to all.
I'm trying to install webacula but after do all tha config i get the next error
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Exception' with message 'Version error
for Catalog database (wanted 12, got 11) ' in
/var/www/webacula/html/index.php:183
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in
'Daniel beas' wrote:
Hi to all.
I'm trying to install webacula but after do all tha config i get the
next error
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Exception' with message 'Version
error for Catalog database (wanted 12, got 11) ' in
/var/www/webacula/html/index.php:183
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Alípio Luiz alipio.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I changed the TCP KeepAlive (60) of the server, and I configured Heartbeat
Interval to 10 in:
- bacula-dir (director section, client section and storage section)
- bacula-sd
- bacula-fd
Now, I'm getting the following
I don't think so... I looked in the event log and didn't see anything about
that.
2010/9/29 John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Alípio Luiz alipio.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
I changed the TCP KeepAlive (60) of the server, and I configured
Heartbeat
Interval to
this is a reference to the version entry in Version Table of bacula database
(catalog) under mysql
updating your bacula database may resolve the problem
- Original Message -
From: Daniel beas
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:48 PM
25 matches
Mail list logo
