Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning

2010-11-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 11/19/2010 4:02 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote: > > > On 11/18/2010 11:00 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> On 11/18/2010 4:20 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote: From: Craig Miskell Subject: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning To: bacula-users Message-ID:<4ce45109.4010...@opus.co.nz> Co

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning

2010-11-19 Thread Craig Miskell
>>> The only problem with the latter approach is that pruning will still occur >>> if >>> a backup runs before you have finished the restore. >> Thanks for both suggestions; the first is a nice clean option, although >> someone >> else suggested making the bscan'd volume Read Only, which is even

Re: [Bacula-users] label formats

2010-11-19 Thread ganiuszka
W dniu 19.11.2010 12:49, Alan Brown pisze: > > Does anyone know if there's a way of only using 3 numeric digits? > > ie 001-999 instead of 0001- Hi, You can use the Counter Resource. For example: Counter { Name = "somename" Maximum = 999 Catalog = "catalog resource name" } Pool { .

[Bacula-users] Bacula crashing after move and upgrade

2010-11-19 Thread Eric Yellin
I had Bacula installed and running properly on FreeBSD for several years. It was running Bacula 1.38. I have an old LTO-1 HP ShureStore changer that worked fine with Bacula 1.38 on the FreeBSD system I had to move the backup system (including changer) to a different server running CentOS 5.5. S

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning

2010-11-19 Thread Bob Hetzel
On 11/18/2010 11:00 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On 11/18/2010 4:20 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote: >>> From: Craig Miskell >>> Subject: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning >>> To: bacula-users >>> Message-ID:<4ce45109.4010...@opus.co.nz> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>>

Re: [Bacula-users] File mismatch by -1, after a computer crash

2010-11-19 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:52:25 +1300, Royce Brown said: > > Using bacula v 5.0.2 on A netbsd machine v 5.1 (64bit ) > > I have this strange problem when after a computer crash, the next time > bacula tries to write to tape it gets the file count wrong by -1 file. > No backups are running whe

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem

2010-11-19 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:09:51 +, Alan Brown said: > > I have one particular restore which only brings back ~11,500 files out > of 980,000 on a full backup. > > Using Bextract and attempting to restore the job that way gives the same > result. > > There are no errors except that the jo

Re: [Bacula-users] Tuning for large (millions of files) backups?

2010-11-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Mikael Fridh wrote: > The FUD stops here, this is pointless in the case of (where this > discussion started) restore performance on a MySQL back-end. In terms of restore performance, you're right. Better optimised queries would speed things up, but probably not by much (see b

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow LTO4 write speed

2010-11-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Lukas Kolbe wrote: > > Maximum Network Buffer Size = bytes > > where bytes specifies the initial network buffer size to use with the File > > daemon. This size will be adjusted down if it is too large until it is > > accepted by the OS. Please use care in setting this value si

Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs waiting on Storage / Volume pool not assigned

2010-11-19 Thread Jonas Sextl
Dear Chris, this is a known bug in version 5.0.2 - see: http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1578 I recommend updating to 5.0.3. That fixed the problem for me. Unfortunately there are no Debian packages yet, but I compiled Bacula 5.0.3 successfully on Debian 5 using the source files from the foll

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow LTO4 write speed

2010-11-19 Thread Lukas Kolbe
Hello Bob, On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 16:09 -0500, Bob Hetzel wrote: > 1) Make sure all the firmwares are up to date: the 1068E card, the tape > drives, specifically. While you're at it, make sure the Adaptec card has > up to date firmware too. Drives, Library, Adaptec cards have the most recent fi

[Bacula-users] Bat restore message: Invalid command ".messages"

2010-11-19 Thread bacula-users
Hello :-) On trying to restore, got the above error message after OKing first screen. Netsearching for the message got only two hits: 1. Oct 07 http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg26974.html Suggested "CommandACL= *all*" in bacula-dir.conf's Console section. Tri

[Bacula-users] label formats

2010-11-19 Thread Alan Brown
Does anyone know if there's a way of only using 3 numeric digits? ie 001-999 instead of 0001- -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, an

Re: [Bacula-users] New server, new questions: umlaute and confusion with changing a client's pool

2010-11-19 Thread Oliver Hoffmann
Am Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:43:39 GMT schrieb Martin Simmons : > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:56:38 +0100, Oliver Hoffmann said: > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:18:14 +0100, Oliver Hoffmann said: > > > > > > > > I had the following problem with 3.0.2 as well as now with > > > > 5.0.2 (runs on

Re: [Bacula-users] 10,000th backup

2010-11-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 11/19/2010 12:38 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Just hit my 10,000th backup with Bacula. Wanted to say thanks again for > this piece of software. Might have been initially a little tricky to set > up, but it does the job day in and day out. The

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning

2010-11-19 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:00:53 +1300, Craig Miskell said: > > Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:02:49 +1300, Craig Miskell said: > >>So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's > >> file > >> records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to

Re: [Bacula-users] Tuning for large (millions of files) backups?

2010-11-19 Thread Mikael Fridh
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Alan Brown wrote: > On 13/11/10 04:46, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: >> You mean "looks increasingly *unlikely*" don't you?  As InnoDB is the >> default in MySQL 5.5... > > Yes it is, but take a look at what Oracle's been doing to the other > opensource projects it inher