El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió:
DB Size:
Total clients:107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB
Total files: 47495362 Database size:31.64 GB
Hi Uwe,
I am having the same problem, backups are fast, but restores takes too
long creating directory tree with bat. I
Hi all
I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up. Should I use
the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I keep them on 5.0.3 until
the director has been upgraded?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió:
DB Size:
Total clients: 107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB
Total files: 47495362 Database size:31.64 GB
Hi Uwe,
I am having the same problem, backups are fast, but restores
El 24/01/12 10:49, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió:
DB Size:
Total clients: 107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB
Total files:47495362 Database size:31.64 GB
Hi Uwe,
I am having
Il 24/01/2012 11:18, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 24/01/12 10:49, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió:
DB Size:
Total clients: 107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB
Total files: 47495362
El 24/01/12 11:47, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 11:18, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 24/01/12 10:49, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió:
DB Size:
Total clients:107 Total bytes stored:
Hi Folks,
I need to know how much disk space my full backups are in use for the
last backup run.
Thanks in advance,
--
Isamar Maia
Cel. VIVO SSA: (55) 71-9146-8575
Cel. TIM SSA: (55) 71-9185-5264
Fixo: (55) 71-4062-8688
日本: +81-(0)3-4550-1212
Skype ID: isamar.maia
Excerpts from Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk's message of Tue Jan 24 04:40:45 -0500 2012:
Hi Roy,
I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming
up. Should I use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should
I keep them on 5.0.3 until the director has been upgraded?
I asked this
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
Hi all
I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up. Should I
use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I keep them on 5.0.3
until the director has been upgraded?
Vennlige
On 01/24/2012 06:21 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 24/01/12 11:47, Marcello Romani escribió:
I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for
each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db
servers. You'd probably have a higher ROI by upgrading the
Thanks for the reply, John. I'll give it a go. The spooling will be on
RAID 10, so I won't get the performance of RAID 0, but we will see how
it goes.
Cheers,
Bryan
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 17:59 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
But will this speed up my backups? Generally speaking, should Bacula
Hi folks,
thanks to your hints and ideas the restore times have been reduced
from 3-4 hours to about five minutes (building the directory tree,
that is).
Lesson learnt: Before complaining loudly to the list, make sure your
db is in good health by administering a generous dosage of repair
table
Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
[snip]
I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for
each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db
servers. You'd probably have a higher ROI by upgrading the DBMS hardware
and/or migrating to
El 24/01/12 17:02, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
[snip]
I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for
each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db
servers. You'd probably have a higher ROI by
Il 24/01/2012 17:43, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 24/01/12 17:02, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
[snip]
I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for
each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Marcello Romani
mrom...@ottotecnica.com wrote:
Il 24/01/2012 17:43, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
El 24/01/12 17:02, Marcello Romani escribió:
Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto:
[snip]
I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog
On 24/01/12 17:08, John Drescher wrote:
I believe it meant that with bacula prior to 5.2.X you had to compile
in your db choice (sqlite, postgresql,mysql) and could not change that
choice at runtime. Now with 5.2 You can mix and match and have more
than 1 catalog.
1: You can only define one
I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up.
Should I use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I
keep them on 5.0.3 until the director has been upgraded?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
It's always recommended that the director version = SD
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:47:31 -0500, mark bergman said:
I'm experiencing a critical problem where tape labels on volumes with data
get corrupted, leaving all data on the tape inaccessible to bacula.
I'm running bacula 5.2.2 built from source, under Linux (CentOS 5.7
x86_64).
This
In the message dated: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:30:44 PST,
The pithy ruminations from Steve Ellis on
Re: [Bacula-users] critical error -- tape labels get corrupted, previous
backups
unreadable were:
= On 1/24/12 2:22 PM, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
= In the message dated: Tue, 24 Jan 2012
20 matches
Mail list logo