Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Xabier Elkano
El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió: DB Size: Total clients:107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB Total files: 47495362 Database size:31.64 GB Hi Uwe, I am having the same problem, backups are fast, but restores takes too long creating directory tree with bat. I

[Bacula-users] Director and FD versions question

2012-01-24 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Hi all I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up. Should I use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I keep them on 5.0.3 until the director has been upgraded? Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió: DB Size: Total clients: 107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB Total files: 47495362 Database size:31.64 GB Hi Uwe, I am having the same problem, backups are fast, but restores

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Xabier Elkano
El 24/01/12 10:49, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió: DB Size: Total clients: 107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB Total files:47495362 Database size:31.64 GB Hi Uwe, I am having

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 24/01/2012 11:18, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 24/01/12 10:49, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió: DB Size: Total clients: 107 Total bytes stored: 34.41 TB Total files: 47495362

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Xabier Elkano
El 24/01/12 11:47, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 11:18, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 24/01/12 10:49, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 10:05, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 23/01/12 16:28, Uwe Schuerkamp escribió: DB Size: Total clients:107 Total bytes stored:

[Bacula-users] SQL Query: Total size of last success full backups

2012-01-24 Thread Isamar Maia
Hi Folks, I need to know how much disk space my full backups are in use for the last backup run. Thanks in advance, -- Isamar Maia Cel. VIVO SSA: (55) 71-9146-8575 Cel. TIM SSA: (55) 71-9185-5264 Fixo: (55) 71-4062-8688 日本: +81-(0)3-4550-1212 Skype ID: isamar.maia

Re: [Bacula-users] Director and FD versions question

2012-01-24 Thread Ben Walton
Excerpts from Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk's message of Tue Jan 24 04:40:45 -0500 2012: Hi Roy, I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up. Should I use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I keep them on 5.0.3 until the director has been upgraded? I asked this

Re: [Bacula-users] Director and FD versions question

2012-01-24 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: Hi all I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up. Should I use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I keep them on 5.0.3 until the director has been upgraded? Vennlige

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/24/2012 06:21 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote: El 24/01/12 11:47, Marcello Romani escribió: I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db servers. You'd probably have a higher ROI by upgrading the

Re: [Bacula-users] Will Bacula be faster with Two Tape Devices?

2012-01-24 Thread Bryan K. Walton
Thanks for the reply, John. I'll give it a go. The spooling will be on RAID 10, so I won't get the performance of RAID 0, but we will see how it goes. Cheers, Bryan On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 17:59 -0500, John Drescher wrote: But will this speed up my backups? Generally speaking, should Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, thanks to your hints and ideas the restore times have been reduced from 3-4 hours to about five minutes (building the directory tree, that is). Lesson learnt: Before complaining loudly to the list, make sure your db is in good health by administering a generous dosage of repair table

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: [snip] I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db servers. You'd probably have a higher ROI by upgrading the DBMS hardware and/or migrating to

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Xabier Elkano
El 24/01/12 17:02, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: [snip] I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db servers. You'd probably have a higher ROI by

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 24/01/2012 17:43, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 24/01/12 17:02, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: [snip] I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog for each client can help you scale, since you can't put them on different db

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Marcello Romani mrom...@ottotecnica.com wrote: Il 24/01/2012 17:43, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: El 24/01/12 17:02, Marcello Romani escribió: Il 24/01/2012 12:21, Xabier Elkano ha scritto: [snip] I'm just thinking out loud, but I don't see how having a catalog

Re: [Bacula-users] Have we reached bacula's limits?

2012-01-24 Thread Alan Brown
On 24/01/12 17:08, John Drescher wrote: I believe it meant that with bacula prior to 5.2.X you had to compile in your db choice (sqlite, postgresql,mysql) and could not change that choice at runtime. Now with 5.2 You can mix and match and have more than 1 catalog. 1: You can only define one

Re: [Bacula-users] Director and FD versions question

2012-01-24 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
I have a director still at 5.0.3, and a few new clients coming up. Should I use the current version (5.2.4) on these FDs, or should I keep them on 5.0.3 until the director has been upgraded? Vennlige hilsener / Best regards It's always recommended that the director version = SD

Re: [Bacula-users] critical error -- tape labels get corrupted, previous backups unreadable

2012-01-24 Thread Martin Simmons
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:47:31 -0500, mark bergman said: I'm experiencing a critical problem where tape labels on volumes with data get corrupted, leaving all data on the tape inaccessible to bacula. I'm running bacula 5.2.2 built from source, under Linux (CentOS 5.7 x86_64). This

Re: [Bacula-users] critical error -- tape labels get corrupted, previous backups unreadable

2012-01-24 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:30:44 PST, The pithy ruminations from Steve Ellis on Re: [Bacula-users] critical error -- tape labels get corrupted, previous backups unreadable were: = On 1/24/12 2:22 PM, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote: = In the message dated: Tue, 24 Jan 2012