Il 17/01/2013 21:36, Craig Isdahl ha scritto:
> All -
>
> I goofed on a config change and have multiple copies of 20gb data
> backups - I don't need all that so I'd like to recycle them immediately
> rather than waiting for auto recycling to happen (90 days). All backups
> are to disk volumes. Wha
On 1/17/2013 2:10 PM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
Josh Fisher wrote:
You don't.
I find it very strange that returning "device full" from a volume
write can reasonably be interpreted as "device not quite full".
The trick is to define a maximum volume size and number of volumes on
the drive so that
Any drawback to a purge right now? None I can think of if you don't need the
data. Marking them used will respect the retention policy which it sounds like
you don't want.
From: Craig Isdahl [mailto:cr...@isdahl.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 03:36 PM
To: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.
All -
I goofed on a config change and have multiple copies of 20gb data
backups - I don't need all that so I'd like to recycle them immediately
rather than waiting for auto recycling to happen (90 days). All backups
are to disk volumes. What's the best way to do that? If I mark them
'used"
On 2013-01-17 11:06, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sometimes getting these errors in my bacula backups:
>
> Fatal error: device.c:192 Catastrophic error. Cannot write overflow
> block to device "DiskStorage-drive-0"
> and it is more likely on the larger volume backups. It seemingly
> res
> I have one question abou backup plan.
>
> I have 500GB web partition I want to backup, I have IBM TS3200 Library and
> two 800GB Tapes
>
> My plan is that Sunday at 2 a.m. I will make full backup and then every day
> Incremental at 2.a.m at first tape.
> Next Sunday I will make again full back
On 1/17/2013 11:06 AM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
Hi,
I am sometimes getting these errors in my bacula backups:
Fatal error: device.c:192 Catastrophic error. Cannot write overflow block to device
"DiskStorage-drive-0"
and it is more likely on the larger volume backups. It seemingly
results from b
Please don't thread hijack. I imagine this is an accident, but it makes things
very confusing when the content matches some other subject line.
From: brconflict [mailto:brconfl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 09:51 AM
To: Florian Heigl
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sub
Hi,
I am sometimes getting these errors in my bacula backups:
Fatal error: device.c:192 Catastrophic error. Cannot write overflow block to device
"DiskStorage-drive-0"
and it is more likely on the larger volume backups. It seemingly results
from bacula trying to write an additional block to a
So I managed a bare-metal restore, but still requires either
static-bacula-fd or bacula-fd with library tools. Compiling bacula-fd
withis --disable-libtool gives me a "No such file or directory", which
indicates that there is a missing library.
So, I know now that the issue I'm having is simply wi
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:52:32AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/17/13 08:33, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> > Could we expect to see better db performance by moving to innodb or
> > one of MariaDB's fancy new backends? I'm especially interested in
> > improving volume recycle times which can be q
On 01/17/13 08:33, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Could we expect to see better db performance by moving to innodb or
> one of MariaDB's fancy new backends? I'm especially interested in
> improving volume recycle times which can be quite long with our setup
> (200GB file table). the DELETE from File where
Bill,
Thanks for the information. Using your ideas and with help from one of our
MySQL programmers we were able to create a script that will work for us.
Jack
On 01/16/13 14:33, Jack Cobb wrote:
> We are using Bacula 5.0.3 on an Ubuntu 10.04 server using MySQL as the
> database engine. We r
Hi
I have one question abou backup plan.
I have 500GB web partition I want to backup, I have IBM TS3200 Library and two
800GB Tapes
My plan is that Sunday at 2 a.m. I will make full backup and then every day
Incremental at 2.a.m at first tape.
Next Sunday I will make again full backup on nex
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:20:48AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> One last footnote: *SOLELY* setting MySQL read-only does NOT guarantee
> a consistent backup. You must FLUSH TABLES, and even then you're still
> not 100% safe on InnoDB.
>
Agreed, I forgot that important step in my previous ema
On 01/17/13 04:55, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:40:26AM +0100, Sven Gehr wrote:
>> Hi@all,
>>
>> is it possible to backu databases e.g. mysql, pgsql (on other hosts)
>> with bacula online?
>
>
> Yes and no. If there are no jobs running you can set the db to read
> only, but
Le 2013-01-16 20:33, Jack Cobb a écrit :
> We are using Bacula 5.0.3 on an Ubuntu 10.04 server using MySQL as
> the database engine. We review each day's backup to verify it
> completed but now our auditors are asking for a report that shows the
> backup job results for the previous twelve months..
On 2013-01-17 05:34, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von Tilman Schmidt :
>
>> One of my Bacula servers backs up 18 clients. Many of these
>> have a lengthy ClientRunBeforeJob. (SVN hot backups, database
>> dumps, Windows system state backups - you get the picture.)
>> As a consequence, more tha
Zitat von Axel Rau :
> Am 15.01.2013 um 23:05 schrieb Axel Rau:
>
>> Files backed up with
>> readfifo = yes
>> seem to be backed up fine:
>> ---
>> Software Compression: None
>> VSS:no
>> Encryption: yes
>> Accurate: no
>> Volume name(s):
Zitat von Sven Gehr :
> Hi@all,
>
> is it possible to backu databases e.g. mysql, pgsql (on other hosts)
> with bacula online?
There are many different possibilities:
- Use the dump utility of the DB to get a consistent dump to backup
maybe with a ClientRunBeforeJob
- Use the DB provided pos
Am 15.01.2013 um 23:05 schrieb Axel Rau:
> Files backed up with
> readfifo = yes
> seem to be backed up fine:
> ---
> Software Compression: None
> VSS:no
> Encryption: yes
> Accurate: no
> Volume name(s): DB1-DB-DAILY-0120
> Volu
Zitat von Tilman Schmidt :
> One of my Bacula servers backs up 18 clients. Many of these
> have a lengthy ClientRunBeforeJob. (SVN hot backups, database
> dumps, Windows system state backups - you get the picture.)
> As a consequence, more than half of the elapsed time of my
> nightly backup runs
Hello,
2013/1/17 Tilman Schmidt
> One of my Bacula servers backs up 18 clients. Many of these
> have a lengthy ClientRunBeforeJob. (SVN hot backups, database
> dumps, Windows system state backups - you get the picture.)
> As a consequence, more than half of the elapsed time of my
> nightly backu
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:40:26AM +0100, Sven Gehr wrote:
> Hi@all,
>
> is it possible to backu databases e.g. mysql, pgsql (on other hosts)
> with bacula online?
>
> --
> Viele Grüsse
>
> Sven Gehr
>
Yes and no. If there are no jobs running you can set the db to read
only, but bacula will
One of my Bacula servers backs up 18 clients. Many of these
have a lengthy ClientRunBeforeJob. (SVN hot backups, database
dumps, Windows system state backups - you get the picture.)
As a consequence, more than half of the elapsed time of my
nightly backup runs is actually spent waiting for one of t
Hi@all,
is it possible to backu databases e.g. mysql, pgsql (on other hosts)
with bacula online?
--
Viele Grüsse
Sven Gehr
--
Viele Grüsse
Sven Gehr
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5
Hi Frank,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, f.staed...@dafuer.de wrote:
> just another question I stumbled upon. While doing more testing with a
> tape library and my rather large backup sets I came across a new
> question. A single full backup of one machine is about 30 TB and while a
> full backup is running
27 matches
Mail list logo
