Le 13/01/2015 16:42, bacula-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a écrit :
10. Upgrade question. (Erik P. Olsen)
Hi,
I upgrade a server bacula 5.2.5 ( ubuntu 12.04 Lts ) to bacula 7.0.5 (
CentOs 7 ) a few weeks...
No problem. export/import Database with dump and copy conf file ( modify
a
Hello Dan,
On 14/01/2015 01:58, Dan Langille wrote:
If they all have distinct values for Address, it works. If not, one or more
Storage are silently ignored.
You are right, some users have many Storage resources in their
configuration, and now, by default, bacula is trying to list only
I tried upgrading from Bacula 5 to Bacula 7 today on FreeBSD 9.3 with
PostgreSQL 9.4
However, running status storage, I'm missing a storage.
Theory: bacula-dir is not properly treating all Storage resources with the same
Address.
If they all have distinct values for Address, it works. If not,
I don't know what's goine ong
On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:44 AM, Heitor Faria hei...@bacula.com.br wrote:
Mr. Langille / Bacula Users,
Did you take a look at this regress output?
I don't know if I'm missing any preparation step.
Regards,
On 2015-01-08 03:22 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I am planning to upgrade bacula from 5.2.13 to 7.0.5. I will back-up the
current
catalogue, remove 5.2.13, install 7.0.5, copy the conf files from 5.2.13 to
7.0.5, restore the catalogue and start bacula again.
Is that feasible?
I also have to
I think the above was submitted:
http://regress.bacula.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=26401
The times may not match up, but you did get one run submitted.
Start Time: 2014-12-29T15:08:12 CET
End Time: 2014-12-29T15:08:12 CET
But I do not see any runs after that.
I looked at your
On Jan 4, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Georg Altmann geo...@george-net.de wrote:
Hey,
I am having trouble getting an HP LTO-3 tape working on FreeBSD 9.3
amd64. The normal btape test finishes successfully but the btape fill
test with two tapes fails. The test fails when btape tries to mount
