Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to restore, but can't

2018-06-12 Thread Ryan Butler
It's attempting to restore directly from a single FULL backup job. I know that once it finishes generating the directory listing that I can mark the directory I want and then it will go ahead and restore everything in it including subfolders. However, option 11, from the online manual says

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to restore, but can't

2018-06-12 Thread Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users
On 06/12/2018 11:35 AM, Ryan Butler wrote: > We're on version 7.0.5, which I know is old, and I have plans to update it > after this disaster. > > Here's the details on that particular Job: > > JobFiles: 2,927,789 Version has nothing to do with it. There are several SQL joins involved in

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to restore, but can't

2018-06-12 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 06/12/18 12:35, Ryan Butler wrote: > I really just need to restore a single directory (and all of its files > and subdirectories), so I’ve been looking at option 11 (enter a list of > directories to restore for jobid), and it looks like I’d have to > manually specify all the subdirectories,

[Bacula-users] Trying to restore, but can't

2018-06-12 Thread Ryan Butler
Hello all, After a failed upgrade to one of our organization's web apps, I'm trying to restore the web app directory from Bacula. I went into bconsole, restore, option 3 (enter jobid), and have been sitting on "Building directory tree for JobId(s) 56810 ..." for the past 12 hours. The MySQL

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out error?

2018-06-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Dan, Thank you for you kind remarks. Just for information: In reality Bacula uses the block sizes you configure (or the default).  You can cause Bacula to write fixed sized blocks, but modern tape drives  (LTO and similar) handle variable sizes quite well, so by default, Bacula will

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula Status Report -- 9 June 2018

2018-06-12 Thread Davide Franco
Hello Wanderlei, There's nothing to worry about the Debian repository you've mentioned If you you compare with a "standard" Debian repo, the major difference is that Bacula version and your personal "key" has been added to the url. Nothing much more. Debian Stretch repository

[Bacula-users] Differential job not performing as expected

2018-06-12 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hello I have a puzzling result that I hope someone might be able to throw some light on. Having completed a full backup successfully, I then run a differential backup. Everything is the same except the backup level=diff. Since no files were modified, I expected the job size to be quite small.

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to Fedora 29 and got an unresolved dependency (libbaccats)

2018-06-12 Thread David While
Did a dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula* and it appeared OK except for the following: Running scriptlet: bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64  13/14 /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache warning: %postun(bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64) scriptlet