Hi,
I am currently testing bacula in order to replace our current backup
solution.
I have been using bweb, since I like how things are displayed.
My current issue is the fact that bweb cannot display any of the details
of a jobs runned and it displays this : Can't get log for jobid 18.
here is
Hi,
We have tested the bacula solution for a few weeks now. We are going to
implement this in our production environment since we are very happy
with all bacula as to offer.
I must ask before going forth with the implementation if the database
will not cause any issues with a environment
Hi,
Currently spending a lot of time on improving the speeds of this network.
After several tests I have realized that the database is inserting
attributes was taking quite a lot of time. In order to improve this I
have searched your forums and see that using batch mode would increase
this
Dan Langille wrote:
On Nov 17, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Pascal Clermont wrote:
Hi,
Currently spending a lot of time on improving the speeds of this
network.
After several tests I have realized that the database is inserting
attributes was taking quite a lot of time. In order to improve this I
I have a daily backup at a incremental level with a 7 days retention
period and this works fine.
I have one share that is very big and would be alot better if it could
run its full on fridays. is it possible for me in the bconsole to
promote the level to full on the fly ?
Or am I obligated to
I have a weird issue that I cannot seem to figure out what is wrong.
I have some backups that failed due to bacula wanting to load a tape
that is not currently in the autochanger.
I have tried several things such as update slots, update slots scan,
update volume to change the inchanger flag.
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Pascal
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Easiest way (before knowing what you mean with
John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Pascal Clermont
pascal-l...@lexum.umontreal.ca wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead
John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a
John Drescher wrote:
this is what I use, but on the next bacula run, bacula kept wanting to
load the tape prior to take into consideration that the tape was past
the expiration time of usage.
The big issue is the fact that the tape is no longer in the library
since it is gone for safe
John Drescher wrote:
If I remove the tape, and do a update slots scan or update slots in
bconsole, the media is still flagged inchanger 1. this is an issue
aswell, but I can live with that, since tapes are back in the library
prior to the Volume Retention.
Are you using bacula 2.4.X and not
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:15:01 -0800, Kevin Keane said:
In my configuration, the bacula-dir and bacula-sd both run as user
bacula rather than root, as recommended.
Now I am trying to run a Run Before script that includes wget to a
password-protected site. The user name
Hi,
I was reading the archives and stumbled upon [Bacula-users] Improving Backup
speed thread which caught my eye since I am having issues.
we backup over 6TB of small files during a full usually started on Friday night
these are far from being finished on Mondays. the transfer on the wire is
Dan Langille wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pascal Clermont wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the archives and stumbled upon [Bacula-users] Improving
Backup speed thread which caught my eye since I am having issues.
we backup over 6TB of small files during a full usually
Dan Langille wrote:
Pascal Clermont wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Pascal Clermont wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the archives and stumbled upon [Bacula-users]
Improving Backup speed thread which caught my eye since I am having
issues.
we backup over 6TB of small files during a full usually started
I have added a new machine to be backed up with bacula and I cannot get a full
backup, always have these weird errors.
the current setup is all centos 5.3 86_64 and every other host besides this one
have been working flawlessly for over 6 months.
DIR Version: Version: 3.0.1 (30 April 2009)
- Original Message -
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] FD command not found:
Pascal Clermont wrote:
I have added a new machine
I have added a new machine to be backed up with bacula and I cannot get a full
backup, always have these weird errors.
the current setup is all centos 5.3 86_64 and every other host besides this one
have been working flawlessly for over 6 months.
DIR Version: Version: 3.0.1 (30 April 2009)
19 matches
Mail list logo
