Hello.
I did a quick test in a virtual machine and discovered the following:
issuing something like
prune jobs client=... yes
in bconsole leaves always at least one full backup job (the newest) in
the catalog, even if it could be pruned because it is much older than
the retention period.
Hello.
It seems I forgot to mention that I tested this with Bacula 3.0.2 from
Debian unstable.
Tobias Brink tobias.br...@gmail.com writes:
I did a quick test in a virtual machine and discovered the following:
issuing something like
prune jobs client=... yes
in bconsole leaves always
Hello.
I'm a little bit confused by the new virtual backup feature in Bacula
3.0.2. I want to do weekly differential backups and monthly
VirtualFull jobs so that I never (rarely) need to do real full backups
which take a lot of time.
The problem is that it is impossible to use the same device
Hello.
First of all thank you for your answer.
Fahrer, Julian jul...@fahrer.net writes:
Hey,
Afaik one storage device can't open 2 volumes from the same pool. So
u can use the same device, but u need different pools for your
normal and virtualfull backups. You need that for a working
Hello.
For the reference for anybody who may have the same problem: I'll now
solve this with the following setup:
* Use 2 pools and 2 devices (disk, with different paths).
* Specify the storage in the pools.
* Use the one pool in even months the other one in odd months.
This will only
Hi!
Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com writes:
I had the following:
RunScript {
RunsWhen = After
RunsOnFailure = Yes
FailJobOnError = Yes
Command = scp -i /path/to/key -o StrictHostkeyChecking=no
/var/lib/bacula/*.bsr u...@host:/path/Bacula/
Fahrer, Julian jul...@fahrer.net writes:
Is no one using verify jobs for virtual fulls?
FWIW I do, and I have the same problem. I’m using version 3.0.2. What
version are you using? Have you tested the newest version (3.0.3), yet?
I don’t have much time at the moment but if no one knows a
Hello!
I run Bacula 3.0.2 (dir and sd) from Debian backports and bacula-fd
5.0.2 (Debian testing) on the client and I have a problem with a disk to
catalog verify job.
I make differential backups every week which get consolidated into a
full backup with the VirtualFull feature once a month. Now
Steve Costaras stev...@chaven.com writes:
Could be due to a transient error (transmission or wild/torn read at
time of calculation). I see this a lot with integrity checking of
files here (50TiB of storage).
Only way to get around this now is to do a known-good sha1/md5 hash of
data (2-3
Tobias Brink tobias.br...@gmail.com writes:
So I still don't know how to proceed. Apart from that I will try to
upgrade my director and sd to 5.0.2 as soon as Debian backports are
available and see if the problem goes away. I will also re-run the
DiskToCatalog after my next differential
Stefan Muenkner stefan.muenk...@uks.eu writes:
Hi,
maybe this is too obvious, but AFAIK the fd-client version should not be
higher (it can be lower...) than the dir version. If, what you wrote was
correct (dir 3.0.2 and fd 5.0.2) could that be causing problems ?
This could be and I'm
Rory Campbell-Lange r...@campbell-lange.net writes:
On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
Rory Campbell-Lange schrieb:
On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
...so I'd like to skip 5.0.2 which is available in lenny-backports
right now.
Does
12 matches
Mail list logo