On 2020-09-01 07:03, Josip Deanovic wrote:
On Monday 2020-08-31 20:02:58 mark.berg...@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
wrote:
The server reports:
Error: bsock.c:383 Write error sending 24573 bytes to Storage
daemon:bacula-server:9103: ERR=Connection timed out
Hello!
Sound like routing
Hello,
I am currently using Bacula 9.6.5 and I am trying to use bconsole
restore command like this:
restore client=testbuild-fd restorejob=testbuild-restore
restoreclient=testbuild-fd where=/ current all yes
According to the 9.6.x documentation:
On 2020-10-07 12:00, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
To be honest I would expect a question about a fileset unless it is a
single fileset for this client. This is how I do in my case:
*restore client=bacula-devel-lxc-fd restorejob=RestoreFiles
fileset="Full
Set" where=/tmp/restores
On 2020-10-08 14:24, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Well, so far, it's only been a few days, so my conclusions are
cautious.
But they are cautiously optimistic. So far, with the Director still
using HAproxy to round-robin DB connectins to my MariaDB cluster, I
have
not seen a single hung job, But
Hello!
I just used %t with ClientRunBeforeJob with a job of type "Backup" and
level "Full" and noticed that %t expanded as "System or Console".
According to the documentation, %t should expand as a job type which
could be Backup, Restore or Admin.
Related line in the Job configuration looks
On 2020-10-06 02:07, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 9/28/20 12:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
test phase 1: All clients and Storage on 9.6.6, Director still on
9.6.3
No hung jobs so far. I plan to leave it this way for at least a week
before upgrading the Director to 9.6.6. as well.
OK, a week
Hello,
Somewhere with Bacula 7, a "6th" week was introduced for Job Scheduler.
I couldn't find the definition of the 6th week in the documentation
and I can only assume that it is meant to be used to target the first
few days of the month which can occur before the "1st" week of the
month.
On 2020-09-30 12:32, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
Radosław, I apologize, it seems that I have sent the message to you
directly instead of sending it to the mailing list.
It happens sometimes when I use my webmail and forget that I need
to send the response to the mailing list.
śr.,
Apologies Kern, I have responded directly to your e-mail instead
of the mailing list.
On 2020-09-28 15:05, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You have to look at the problem from a slightly different point of
> view.
>
> The filters or specifiers 1st, ... 6th simply say that if the
> current
On 2020-10-01 10:47, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
I have an impression that you and I are talking about two totally
distinctive things, so to progress with our discussion all things
have to be cleared out.
It looks like it but not completely.
I hope it will be more clear after my
On 2020-10-01 13:41, Martin Simmons wrote:
I think Josip wants a single email that combines the logs from the job
that
reads the old volume (the Copy job) and the job that writes to the new
volume
(the new Backup job).
This would be like the single email that you get for a normal backup
Hello,
Copy job is a bit special in a way that it starts and performs the copy
of selected jobs, depending on the "Selection Type" directive.
The problem is that when a job is copied, messages of the Copy
job and the messages related to the job that is being copied are
not combined which
12 matches
Mail list logo
