Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with size of the backup

2024-04-11 Thread Borut Rozman via Bacula-users
Hi All, 

thanks for the pointing out the obvious, it was 2 files growing out of
proportions (steam logs) and they got compressed on a FS level but
actually they were 2.5 tb x2 in size which then got compressed again in
bacula, so all good now.

Thanks
Borut

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 23:06 +1000, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/04/2024 22:00, Borut Rozman via Bacula-users wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > I was wondering if anyone noticed something like this in their
> > environment, I have a bacula director ver 11.0.6. (10.3.2022)
> > connecting to serveral clients with versions from 5 onwards. I have
> > this particular client which runs on debain 12. ver.
> > 9.6.7(20dec20),
> > underlaying storage is ZFS.
> > 
> > The underlying storage is ~800gb in size. All of the sudden
> > incremental
> > backups started to increase exponentially
> > 
> > 1.4. - 93M
> > 2.4. - 574.5Mcef_log.txt
> > 3.4. - 115.5GB
> > 4.4. - 951.3GB
> > 5.4. - 1.7TB
> > 6.4. - 2.5TB
> > 7.4. - 3.4TB
> > 8.4. - 4.1TB
> > 9.4. - 4.7TB
> > 10.4.- 5.4TB
> > 
> > so last backup says 5,471,496,436,363 (5.471 TB) written, and last
> > 4
> > backups from this client with several others were written to this
> > tape
> > which is LTO6 - so max 2.5TB should be written (6.25 compressed).
> > 
> > For some reason estimation of the size of the backup is way off and
> > data written on the tape as now that tape says it has 18T written -
> > Vol. bytes  18.3TB
> > 
> > which is absolutely wrong...
> > 
> > even if I move that data to some other folder on that server I get
> > the
> > same result.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > 
> > Borut
> > 
> Have you got Accurate set to Yes in JobDefs?
> 
> My ZFS systems are Solaris, so YMMV.
> 
> Cheers,
> GaryB-)
> 
> 
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with size of the backup

2024-04-11 Thread Borut Rozman via Bacula-users


On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 23:06 +1000, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/04/2024 22:00, Borut Rozman via Bacula-users wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > I was wondering if anyone noticed something like this in their
> > environment, I have a bacula director ver 11.0.6. (10.3.2022)
> > connecting to serveral clients with versions from 5 onwards. I have
> > this particular client which runs on debain 12. ver.
> > 9.6.7(20dec20),
> > underlaying storage is ZFS.
> > 
> > The underlying storage is ~800gb in size. All of the sudden
> > incremental
> > backups started to increase exponentially
> > 
> > 1.4. - 93M
> > 2.4. - 574.5M
> > 3.4. - 115.5GB
> > 4.4. - 951.3GB
> > 5.4. - 1.7TB
> > 6.4. - 2.5TB
> > 7.4. - 3.4TB
> > 8.4. - 4.1TB
> > 9.4. - 4.7TB
> > 10.4.- 5.4TB
> > 
> > so last backup says 5,471,496,436,363 (5.471 TB) written, and last
> > 4
> > backups from this client with several others were written to this
> > tape
> > which is LTO6 - so max 2.5TB should be written (6.25 compressed).
> > 
> > For some reason estimation of the size of the backup is way off and
> > data written on the tape as now that tape says it has 18T written -
> > Vol. bytes  18.3TB
> > 
> > which is absolutely wrong...
> > 
> > even if I move that data to some other folder on that server I get
> > the
> > same result.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > 
> > Borut
> > 
> Have you got Accurate set to Yes in JobDefs?
> 
> My ZFS systems are Solaris, so YMMV.
> 

I am using ZFS for a while and this just happened now before all was
well, and yes I do have accurate to YES

Borut



> Cheers,
> GaryB-)
> 
> 
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Issue with size of the backup

2024-04-11 Thread Borut Rozman via Bacula-users
Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone noticed something like this in their
environment, I have a bacula director ver 11.0.6. (10.3.2022)
connecting to serveral clients with versions from 5 onwards. I have
this particular client which runs on debain 12. ver. 9.6.7(20dec20),
underlaying storage is ZFS. 

The underlying storage is ~800gb in size. All of the sudden incremental
backups started to increase exponentially 

1.4. - 93M
2.4. - 574.5M
3.4. - 115.5GB
4.4. - 951.3GB
5.4. - 1.7TB
6.4. - 2.5TB
7.4. - 3.4TB
8.4. - 4.1TB
9.4. - 4.7TB
10.4.- 5.4TB

so last backup says 5,471,496,436,363 (5.471 TB) written, and last 4
backups from this client with several others were written to this tape
which is LTO6 - so max 2.5TB should be written (6.25 compressed). 

For some reason estimation of the size of the backup is way off and
data written on the tape as now that tape says it has 18T written -
Vol. bytes  18.3TB 

which is absolutely wrong...

even if I move that data to some other folder on that server I get the
same result.

Any ideas?

Borut



___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users