[Bacula-users] Re-2: Re-2: Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes a long time

2012-11-01 Thread Carsten Pache
Only applicable to InnoDB tables, but then you ARE using InnoDB, not MyISAM right? *Right?* Sorry that I have to ask this, but: How do I know if my MySQL installation is using InnoDB tables? Edit /etc/my.cnf to change innodb_log-file-size and innodb_log_files_in_group. Current values

[Bacula-users] Re-2: Re-2: Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes a long time

2012-10-31 Thread Carsten Pache
An additional option is that after upgrading the database server it returned to the default database config file which in a lot of cases is optimized for machines with a few MB (yes MB) of memory. I do not remember that I had to change the defaut database configuration when I

[Bacula-users] Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes a long time

2012-10-30 Thread Carsten Pache
Last week I updated my bacula server from Ubuntu 10.04 to 12.04. During this update Bacula was also updated from 5.0.3 to 5.2.5. Since then the backups of my Windows 2003 servers take much longer than before. One example: With Bacula 5.0.3: 02-Okt 18:45 Bandsicherung-dir JobId 2574: Start

[Bacula-users] Re-2: Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes a long time

2012-10-30 Thread Carsten Pache
Last week I updated my bacula server from Ubuntu 10.04 to 12.04. During this update Bacula was also updated from 5.0.3 to 5.2.5. Since then the backups of my Windows 2003 servers take much longer than before. ... It seems that Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes much longer

[Bacula-users] Re-2: Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes a long time

2012-10-30 Thread Carsten Pache
It seems that Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes much longer than before. Can you give me some aid in solving this problem? Which database backend is this? When you upgraded Ubuntu, did the catalog database get recreated? Maybe it has lost some indexes or the rdbms

[Bacula-users] VolStatus changes from APPEND to USED after a restore - is this expected behaviour?

2011-12-01 Thread Carsten Pache
A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were restored successfully, the VolStatus (shown by list volumes) of the two tapes that were needed during restore changed from Append to Used. Is this an expected behaviour? Regards Carsten Pache

Re: [Bacula-users] VolStatus changes from APPEND to USED after a restore

2011-12-01 Thread Carsten Pache
after one day (1 d)? Or rather how do I force Bacula (5.0.3 in my case) to change the VolStatus? Regards Carsten Pache -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record

[Bacula-users] Re-2: Automatic recycling of volumes/tapes

2011-07-14 Thread Carsten Pache
BTW, unless you use separate pools for each day there will be a time when Bacula will insist using the Friday tape on Monday. Can you tell me why/when this behaviour would occur? Using separate pools for each day: Would this (IMHO interesting) concept prevent using a Monday tape on e.g.