Re: [Bacula-users] Auto-labeling volumes depending on tape-in-drive?

2005-10-05 Thread Joe Rhett
for (and use) the oldest tape available for it to recycle. Not create a new tape. If I want to add more tapes to the pool, I can choose to do that as meets my own needs. I don't want Bacula trying to wish new tapes into existence that I have no intention to purchase. -- Joe Rhett senior geek

Re: [Bacula-users] Auto-labeling volumes depending on tape-in-drive?

2005-09-29 Thread Joe Rhett
it working yet, but I wasn't sure if the scratch pool was one of those Features in the manual, that was not in the Stable version of the bacula code. Cheers, Silas =0) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Rhett Sent: Wednesday

Re: [Bacula-users] Serious question! Recycle versus wishful thinking...

2005-09-21 Thread Joe Rhett
=*None* CleaningPrefix=*None* recyleOldest=0 MaxVolJobs=0 MaxVolFiles=0 *version maiasaura-dir Version: 1.34.6 (28 July 2004) -- Joe Rhett senior geek meer.net --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges

Re: [Bacula-users] Serious question! Recycle versus wishful thinking...

2005-09-20 Thread Joe Rhett
On 18.09.2005 07:12, Joe Rhett wrote: Before I go to all of that trouble, could someone kindly look at the configuration I posted and tell me what is missing? I'm fairly certain that it is a configuration problem. I doubt that so many people using it wouldn't have found this problem before

Re: [Bacula-users] Serious question! Recycle versus wishful thinking...

2005-09-20 Thread Joe Rhett
Volumes Recycle Oldest Volume = yes AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes Volume Retention = 1 months # one month Accept Any Volume = yes # write on any volume in the pool } So why isn't this volume being recycled? -- Joe Rhett senior geek

[Bacula-users] Serious question! Recycle versus wishful thinking...

2005-09-17 Thread Joe Rhett
, but it appears that the documentation is seriously misleading in this regard. On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:33:28PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote: On 15.09.2005 09:06, Joe Rhett wrote: Okay, bacula seems to do two things that I believe are configured to not happen. It's probably me, so clue me in here: 1

Re: [Bacula-users] Serious question! Recycle versus wishful thinking...

2005-09-17 Thread Joe Rhett
On 17.09.2005 08:49, Joe Rhett wrote: Alright people, I seriously need an explanation here. You have X volumes, which are each retained for Y retention time. You can add another volume by labelling it. If no free volume is available, and Recycle is enabled, Bacula should recycle

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't get bacula to recycle a volume

2005-09-16 Thread Joe Rhett
On 15.09.2005 09:06, Joe Rhett wrote: Okay, bacula seems to do two things that I believe are configured to not happen. It's probably me, so clue me in here: 1. It isn't recycling a volume that is way past it's retension time 2. It keep creating new volumes that don't exist. I think

[Bacula-users] Can't get bacula to recycle a volume

2005-09-15 Thread Joe Rhett
/backups Maximum Spool Size = 150 } -- Joe Rhett senior geek meer.net --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma