Re: [Bacula-users] Suggestion for a REALLY handy enhancement, shouldn't be hard either...

2005-10-21 Thread Lyle Vogtmann
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Bacula_Console.html#SECTION000208000

Not exactly what you want, but should be a good starting point.

On 10/21/05, Sherwood McGowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is there any way we could get the ability to do this?

 I'd love to be able to issue a batch command to bconsole, something similar
 to

 bconsole --batch 'status ; 1'

 Which would tell bconsole to run the command status and then 1 (gets the
 status of the director) and then exit, outputting the information to the
 screen (so I can have scripts parse it). Another example:

 Bconsole --batch 'run ; 8 ; yes'

 Which would tell bconsole to issue run and 8 (job #8) and then yes to
 start the backup. This would be great so I can have some simple scripts that
 force a backup to run, without having to have user interaction...

 Any thoughts?

 Thank you,
 Sherwood




 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
 and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
 ___
 Bacula-users mailing list
 Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Large network bacula tips?

2005-10-17 Thread Lyle Vogtmann
Thank you for the response!

On 10/17/05, Mark Bober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I get about ~20 MB/s from my fastest storage, so that's 1200 MB/min, or 1.2 
 GB/min. You're
 pulling 300MB/min, or 5 MB/s.

I thought so, thanks for verifying my sanity.

 So you might be a touch slow. I have a maximum of 4 jobs running on any given 
 storage device,
 however, and usually during fulls on the weekend I've got no more than 4 jobs 
 running at any
 given time anyway.

I was thinking of limiting the number of concurrent jobs.  The project
manager really wants to have them all done simultaneously, not 100%
sure on the reasoning, but it is listed as a requirement.  If it has a
large negative impact on performance, I'm sure we can drop that
requirement.

 Here's my setup:

 bacula-dir: Sun v20z (dual Opt, 4g ram) running CentOS 4.1 (RHEL clone).

 Tape Storage: Either Quantum SDLT/160 Autoloader or Overland LXB SDLT/110 
 changer for
 large jobs, hanging off an U320 MPT SCSI PCI-X controller.

 My spool device is a set of random SCSI disks, mostly old 50 giggers, in a 
 striped software raid.
 About 400G. They're on a PCI 33mhz controller, a Symbios something-or-other. 
 Nothing special.

 All gigabit to major servers.

 All in all I've got about 80 clients, Windows, Solaris, and Linux. A few 
 OSF/1 also. I've ran about
 3500 jobs, and have totalled about 17 TB over the past... 2 1/2 months I've 
 been production with
 Bacula.

 (I secretly hope that wins me some sort of Biggest Bacula award)

:)  Anyone have any statistics to top it?

 Suggestions:

 1) Solaris storage-d was *very slow*. It's Solaris's fault. Try a linux 
 storage-d, see what happens.
 My Linux clients always outpace everything else, even given the same 
 hardware. Go ahead and
 shoot for 1.37.40 as well.

OK, wasn't sure how stable that release was, but since I'm still in
testing mode, it doesn't really matter.  I'll give it a go.

 2) It's Virtuozzo, also. I've got a set of VMWare ESX servers, same hardware 
 as the director. They
 go about 5 MB/s to disk, which GZIP compression on, when I'd expect 20 MB/s 
 from a plain Linux
 install without GZIP. Not much can be done about that, really. (this is the 
 VMWare itself - the linux
 underpinnings, not the virtual machines, backing up). If those 65 virtual 
 machines all have load
 on each server, I'm amazed they're that fast at all.

None of the clients are vps's themselves.  Just hosting vps's, so I
guess I could have left that out of my original message.  They are the
main cause of the large amount of data.

 If you're backing up to disk, drop GZIP once and see how it goes. If you're 
 going straight to tape,
 you're pretty much at the limit then. That's a lot of virtualization.

Yep, to disk.  I forgot about the gzip compression, thanks for reminding me.

I appreciate the suggestions!

Lyle


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


[Bacula-users] Large network bacula tips?

2005-10-13 Thread Lyle Vogtmann
Hello fellow Bacula users!

I've only been lurking on this list for a little while, please excuse
me if this topic has been covered previously.

I've got what I would consider a large network of machines each
hosting many virtual private servers with Virtuozzo. 
http://www.swsoft.com/en/products/virtuozzo/  (19 servers, each
hosting an average of 65 virtual environments, average 160GB data per
server.   Total data to back up ~ 3TB.  Generous estimate to allow for
growth.)

I've been tasked with replacing an aging Amanda install that has been
backing them up to disk daily.

I've done some testing already with a couple of the servers, and have
recently started a backup of all systems.  Ran into a small problem
with the catalog where the File table grew to 4GB and claimed to be
full, easily fixed by switching from MyISAM to the InnoDB engine.  It
got me thinking though, are there any other gotchas or caveats
anyone else has overcome in backing up such a large quantity of data?

We have a gigabit Ethernet network over which the backups are run, but
it still seems to take an inordinate amount of time to complete a full
backup.  Currently filling a two gigabyte volume every 6 minutes on
average.  At that rate, it will take 6 days to finish a full backup?! 
Maybe I'm doing the math wrong (I already know I haven't taken
compression into account), but I think I'm missing something.

Comments and suggestions welcome!  Thanks for such a great project! 
(It's backing up my home network of 3 Macs handily!)

Oh yeah:
Director is running on a FreeBSD 5.4 box, all other clients are Linux.
 Bacula version 1.36.3 compiled from source (ports tree on director).

Thanks in advance,
Lyle Vogtmann


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users