On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Adrian Reyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 01:38:23AM +0200, Olle Romo wrote:
>> What I mean is that if I have a drive removed, run the job then
>> attach
>> the drive and run the job again, Bacula will do a full backup of the
>> driv
very helpful if I could switch this on or off.
Thomas - the dynamic fileset looks interesting. I will try it. Thank
you.
All best,
Olle
On Aug 16, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:43:05 +0200 schrieb Olle Romo:
>
>> Thank you Uwe. I misunderstood the
Thank you Uwe. I misunderstood the concept.
Is there a way to have Bacula just continue incremental backup of a
drive even if it was offline for one run?
All best,
Olle
On Aug 9, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:07:41AM +0200, Olle Romo wrote:
>&g
Hi All,
'Ignore Fileset Changes = yes' doesn't seem to have the effect I was
hoping for... If a drive is missing on one run, the next time Bacula
sees the drive it will proceed to backup the entire thing again. I'm
sure there's an obvious way to avoid this but I can't seem to find
it... An
Phil,
Thanks very much! I will try it out asap.
All best,
Olle
On Oct 2, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/01/10 18:51, Olle Romo wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm a newbie here and I'd just like to get someone's thoughts on
>> this -
&g
Hi All,
I'm a newbie here and I'd just like to get someone's thoughts on this -
I want to run several rotating backups sets of the same files; one set
of tapes at home and one set at work and then rotate and keep
incrementing on both.
What I'm doing (and it's working ok) is I use several vir
Dear all,
Sorry if this question is painfully noobish but I'm trying to figure
out how to keep two rotating tape sets of complete backups where I can
keep one set off site. Will separate catalogs do it? I don't want to
prune or in any other way start over. Just keep two sets of tapes that
