[Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Ben Schmidt
Hallo bacula Mailinglist,

I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
can't get bacula running.

Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
No SSL/TLS in use.

The FD Config was taken from the old Server and Network/FW isn't the
Problem ether, I can telnet the FD from the DIR.

dir# telnet client_ip 9102
Trying client_ip...
Connected to client_ip.
Escape character is '^]'.

fd# netstat -npl | grep 9102
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:91020.0.0.0:*
LISTEN  30826/bacula-fd


Here is the Error Message:

20-Apr 15:14 backup1-dir JobId 15348: Start Backup JobId 15348,
Job=Backup-fd-name.2011-04-20_15.14.04
20-Apr 15:14 backup1-dir JobId 15348: Using Device Device-fd-name
20-Apr 15:14 backup1-dir JobId 15348: Fatal error: File daemon at
fd-ip:9102 rejected Hello command
20-Apr 15:14 backup1-dir JobId 15348: Error: Bacula backup1-dir 2.2.6
(10Nov07): 20-Apr-2011 15:14:20


Does anyone has any Idea how I could solve the Issue without upgrading
the DIR or downgrading the FD?

Thanks a lot,

Ben

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
 I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
 it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
 can't get bacula running.

 Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
 Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
 No SSL/TLS in use.
 ...
Old dir with new clients won't work. The communications protocols have 
been updated so the old dir doesn't know how to talk to the new client.

The easiest solution might be to rebuild the old client on the new 
platform, though a complete upgrade to the latest 5.0.3 might be better 
for future-proof-ness.

Regards,
Jeremy

  DISCLAIMER 
http://www.schaubroeck.be/maildisclaimer.htm

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Jérôme Blion
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
 Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
 I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
 it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
 can't get bacula running.

 Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
 Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
 No SSL/TLS in use.
 ...
 Old dir with new clients won't work. The communications protocols have
 been updated so the old dir doesn't know how to talk to the new client.

 The easiest solution might be to rebuild the old client on the new
 platform, though a complete upgrade to the latest 5.0.3 might be better
 for future-proof-ness.

 Regards,
 Jeremy

Hello,

Is there a compatibility matrix available ?

HTH.
Jérôme Blion.

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion jerome.bl...@free.fr wrote:
 Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
 Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
 I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
 it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
 can't get bacula running.

 Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
 Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
 No SSL/TLS in use.
 ...
 Old dir with new clients won't work. The communications protocols have
 been updated so the old dir doesn't know how to talk to the new client.

 The easiest solution might be to rebuild the old client on the new
 platform, though a complete upgrade to the latest 5.0.3 might be better
 for future-proof-ness.

 Regards,
 Jeremy

 Hello,

 Is there a compatibility matrix available ?


No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always
= client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage.

John

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Jérôme Blion
Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
 On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blionjerome.bl...@free.fr  wrote:
 Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
 Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
 I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
 it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
 can't get bacula running.

 Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
 Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
 No SSL/TLS in use.
 ...
 Old dir with new clients won't work. The communications protocols have
 been updated so the old dir doesn't know how to talk to the new client.

 The easiest solution might be to rebuild the old client on the new
 platform, though a complete upgrade to the latest 5.0.3 might be better
 for future-proof-ness.

 Regards,
 Jeremy

 Hello,

 Is there a compatibility matrix available ?

 No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always = 
 client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage.
 John
Hello,

This rule is not the real truth.
I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze) 
Director (and Storage)
Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?

Best regards.
Jerome Blion.

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread John Drescher
 This rule is not the real truth.
 I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
 Director (and Storage)

That does not violate the rule I gave.

 Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?


This rule has been told to us from the developers countless times on this list.

John

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Steve Ellis
On 4/20/2011 3:26 PM, John Drescher wrote:
 This rule is not the real truth.
 I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
 Director (and Storage)
 That does not violate the rule I gave.

 Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?

 This rule has been told to us from the developers countless times on this 
 list.

 John

Just to clarify--at least in my mail reader, part of John's answer was 
rendered as a quoted line rather than as an explicit greater-than sign.  
I believe what he sent was director same version as storage, and 
server's version greater than or equal to client.  Note that bacula 2.2 
is more than 3 years old.

-se

-se


--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 21/04/2011 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
 Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
[SNIP]

 No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always = 
 client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage.
 John
 Hello,

 This rule is not the real truth.
 I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
 Director (and Storage)
 Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?


Be *very* aware of the vagaries of email clients, the line above from 
John appaers to contain the phrase always = client, when his original 
post contained always  = client.

This is because somewhere in the chain something wrapped the
  line at  = and
so the   was seen as being a quote lead-in rather than
  the = which was intended.

(I wonder how badly mangled this will appear.)

To re-iterate, the simple rule is: The server (director and storage) 
version must be always be greater than or equal to the client version.

Cheers,
GaryB-)

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread John Drescher
 Be *very* aware of the vagaries of email clients, the line above from
 John appaers to contain the phrase always = client, when his original
 post contained always  = client.

 This is because somewhere in the chain something wrapped the
  line at  = and
 so the   was seen as being a quote lead-in rather than
  the = which was intended.

 (I wonder how badly mangled this will appear.)

 To re-iterate, the simple rule is: The server (director and storage)
 version must be always be greater than or equal to the client version.


Thanks for fixing that I did use = without the quotes being that I
am a programmer in the day job. Not sure how that got messed up from
the chain. Sorry for causing confusion..

John

--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users