Re: [Bacula-users] looking for a tape

2011-02-22 Thread Bob Hetzel
, bacula ignores the InChanger field. Bob > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:47:15 -0600 > From: > Subject: [Bacula-users] looking for a tape > To: > Message-ID: > > > > The following is on a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 system with bacula 2.0.3-10 installed > and work

Re: [Bacula-users] looking for a tape

2011-02-21 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:31 PM, wrote: >>> >>> How can I get this library to look for the next tape (04)? >>> >> >>I am not sure exactly why you want this but you could always mark the >>other two tapes Full, Used, or Archive so that bacula ignores them. >> >>John > > It won't run a backup,

Re: [Bacula-users] looking for a tape

2011-02-21 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
>> >> How can I get this library to look for the next tape (04)? >> > >I am not sure exactly why you want this but you could always mark the >other two tapes Full, Used, or Archive so that bacula ignores them. > >John It won't run a backup, it keeps telling me to load tape 3 which is offsite a

Re: [Bacula-users] looking for a tape

2011-02-21 Thread John Drescher
> The following is on a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 system with bacula 2.0.3-10 installed > and working very well except for the following: You should really update to a more recent version. 2.0.3 is over 4 years old and has many bugs that were fixed in future versions. The current bacula version is 5.0.3.

[Bacula-users] looking for a tape

2011-02-21 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
The following is on a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 system with bacula 2.0.3-10 installed and working very well except for the following: I have a library that is looking for a tape that is not in the library 21-Feb 09:34 bacula-sd: 3302 Autochanger "loaded? drive 0", result: nothing loaded. 21-Feb 09:34 b