Re: [Bacula-users] [BULK] Re: [BULK] Re: 3.0 upgrade success

2009-04-29 Thread Simon Ekstrand
2009/4/28 Attila Fülöp lichtsc...@gesindel.org: Simon Ekstrand wrote: 2009/4/23 Attila Fülöp lichtsc...@gesindel.org: Ever thought of using multiple catalogs, eg one catalog for each client or client group? This should mitigate most of the catalog issues you have. Yes, we've thought about

Re: [Bacula-users] [BULK] Re: [BULK] Re: 3.0 upgrade success

2009-04-28 Thread Attila Fülöp
Simon Ekstrand wrote: 2009/4/23 Attila Fülöp lichtsc...@gesindel.org: Ever thought of using multiple catalogs, eg one catalog for each client or client group? This should mitigate most of the catalog issues you have. Yes, we've thought about it. That has it's own set of problem though. One

Re: [Bacula-users] [BULK] Re: [BULK] Re: 3.0 upgrade success

2009-04-28 Thread John Drescher
Regarding the bconsole complexity, we thought about a catalog for each client. With a consistent naming scheme like client-fd and client-cat it should be obvious which catalog to use. We have relatively few clients but long retention times. YMMV though. If anyone has any suggestions for