Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Hetzel
Richard Scobie wrote: Bob Hetzel wrote: Has anybody gotten 5.0.0 to label tapes properly? I upgraded to 5.0.0 a couple days ago and backups worked that first night until they ran out of appendable (i.e. already partially written) media. Since that point, I've been completely stuck.

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/04/10 15:25, Bob Hetzel wrote: Upgrading to Ubuntu 9.10 brought along a ton of upgraded programs and libraries so I've no idea where to begin. Ubuntu 9.10 was a *very* bad update. I've been advising people to just avoid it and wait for 10.04. Based on various reports I've seen, more

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Richard Scobie
Bob Hetzel wrote: My next thought was to try use tar to read and write from a tape. That works fine: I've been able to back up an entire directory and restore files from it. I've also back up a single file and restored that file, comparing it to the original file and no differences were

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Hetzel
Richard Scobie wrote: Bob Hetzel wrote: My next thought was to try use tar to read and write from a tape. That works fine: I've been able to back up an entire directory and restore files from it. I've also back up a single file and restored that file, comparing it to the original file

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Richard Scobie
Bob Hetzel wrote: The auto test passed, but I now cannot mount any tape from within bacula, either completely new (i.e. unlabeled) or filled completely with bacula backups. It always thinks the tape is not labeled, giving errors like these: This is exactly what I was seeing and the problem

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-03 Thread Bob Hetzel
Has anybody gotten 5.0.0 to label tapes properly? I upgraded to 5.0.0 a couple days ago and backups worked that first night until they ran out of appendable (i.e. already partially written) media. Since that point, I've been completely stuck. I just ran the btape auto test on a lark and

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-03 Thread Richard Scobie
Bob Hetzel wrote: Has anybody gotten 5.0.0 to label tapes properly? I upgraded to 5.0.0 a couple days ago and backups worked that first night until they ran out of appendable (i.e. already partially written) media. Since that point, I've been completely stuck. Is bacula the only thing you

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-02 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Bob Hetzel b...@case.edu wrote: John Drescher wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Bob Hetzel b...@case.edu wrote: Greetings, I've just upgraded to 5.0.0 and have run into this odd issue.  Bacula seems to be stuck waiting for a labeled volume, even

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-02 Thread Bob Hetzel
John Drescher wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Bob Hetzel b...@case.edu wrote: John Drescher wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Bob Hetzel b...@case.edu wrote: Greetings, I've just upgraded to 5.0.0 and have run into this odd issue. Bacula seems to be stuck waiting for a