On 08/28/17 07:50, Josh Fisher wrote:
> I have considered a cloud solution as an off-site storage, but abandoned
> it for now for due to that very reason. Cloud storage is simply not yet
> fast enough, or I should say that the Internet is not yet fast enough.
> What if the restore would require
I agree Josh. As we review this current internet speed limitation more, I
think we will use AWS cloud for servers with small to moderate data size.
For example, a Linux server which manages a web app and has a total disk
size of under 50 GB will go to the cloud.
Servers with storage which
On 8/25/2017 1:49 PM, Luke Salsich wrote:
One remaining concern which I have (not related to Bacula at all) is
the time it would take to conduct a complete system restore due to
needing to transfer the data from AWS to our local. Even with their
fast connection, a 150 GB transfer could take
Hi All,
I've posted a couple of questions here in the last few months about our
12-month test of switching Bacula to using virtual tapes, drives and
changers through the AWS Storage Gateway.
We are about 10 months into our test and after overcoming a bunch of
hurdles, things seem to be going
