Re: [Bacula-users] Backup strategy not-so-strict schedule

2005-09-26 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Alan Brown wrote: On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Timo Neuvonen wrote: - nominally, the next tape would be taken into use in the beginning of every month Reasons behind this are minimal manual handling of the tapes, knowing there will be loss of up to one month's data if the current tape gets

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup strategy not-so-strict schedule

2005-09-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 25 September 2005 00:24, Timo Neuvonen wrote: After some occasional experiments with Bacula, I finally started reading the manual (my printed version is for 1.36.0) page by page, my goal being to set up a decently working backup strategy instead of occasional backups. So far, my

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup strategy not-so-strict schedule

2005-09-25 Thread Alan Brown
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Timo Neuvonen wrote: - nominally, the next tape would be taken into use in the beginning of every month Reasons behind this are minimal manual handling of the tapes, knowing there will be loss of up to one month's data if the current tape gets destroyed. I believe my tape

[Bacula-users] Backup strategy not-so-strict schedule

2005-09-24 Thread Timo Neuvonen
After some occasional experiments with Bacula, I finally started reading the manual (my printed version is for 1.36.0) page by page, my goal being to set up a decently working backup strategy instead of occasional backups. So far, my idea is roughly the following: - pool of 12 tapes, each of