Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Thanks for clearing all this up, that makes sense about not using the schedule when executed manually and the default behavior when not specified (As I was specifying it in the schedule). I spoke to soon, looking at the schedule, it correctly showed the intended Job Type. It started with a Full

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I spoke to soon, looking at the schedule, it correctly showed the intended Job Type. It started with a Full on the specified time in the Schedule and the next few scheduled times after that had specified Differential's so the schedule showed this. When it came time to run it (on its own as per

[Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have a schedule defined as follows: Schedule { Name = Server Data Weekly Cycle Run = Level=Full mon at 18:00 Run = Level=Differential tue-fri at 18:00 } A job as follows: Job { Name = Backup-Data-client Client = client-fd JobDefs = Default Pool = Svr_Data Storage = name

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-11 Thread Cedric Tefft
Joseph L. Casale wrote: When I run it the first time, it does a FULL, when I add data, and run it again, it does am Incremental? What am I missing? I was expecting a Differential? When you ran the job the first and second time, do you mean you initiated the job manually (i.e. with the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
When you ran the job the first and second time, do you mean you initiated the job manually (i.e. with the run command in the console) or do you mean you sat back, did nothing, and let bacula start the job all by itself based on the schedule? I used the run command (Well weBacula did actually). I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-11 Thread Cedric Tefft
Joseph L. Casale wrote: When you ran the job the first and second time, do you mean you initiated the job manually (i.e. with the run command in the console) or do you mean you sat back, did nothing, and let bacula start the job all by itself based on the schedule? I used the run

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-11 Thread Mike Ruskai
On 9/11/2009 9:16 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: When you ran the job the first and second time, do you mean you initiated the job manually (i.e. with the run command in the console) or do you mean you sat back, did nothing, and let bacula start the job all by itself based on the schedule?

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula not running correct job type

2009-09-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
You're not actually testing your schedule settings when you run the job manually. Cedric/Mike, Thanks for clearing all this up, that makes sense about not using the schedule when executed manually and the default behavior when not specified (As I was specifying it in the schedule). It's now