On Wed, 18 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote:
This says to me that as long as the Pools of the Jobs being queued match,
the Jobs will all run concurrently. Jobs however that have mismatching
Pools will instead queue and wait for the storage device to free when
previous jobs complete.
That's about
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Well, the idea of obtaining a tape drive at the last minute is interesting,
and I'm going to think about it carefully, but my intuition tells me it is
dangerous. You could have 10 jobs partially completed all waiting for one
tape drive. This could bring
Hi Sean,
It is possible to have Concurrent Jobs running and spooling in the
second scenario :-)
You can send more details.
Ludovic
Sean O'Grady wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour
and how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage
Well its good to know that Bacula will do what I need!
Guess now I need to determine what I've done wrong in my configs ...
I'm short forming all the config inforation to reduce the size of the
e-mail but I can post my full configs if necessary. Anywhere where I
have Maximum Concurrent Jobs I've
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 23:46, Sean O'Grady wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour and
how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage Device.
The basics of my setup are multiple clients and a single Storage device.
I specify that all
Hi.
Sean O'Grady wrote:
Well its good to know that Bacula will do what I need!
Guess now I need to determine what I've done wrong in my configs ...
I'm short forming all the config inforation to reduce the size of the
e-mail but I can post my full configs if necessary. Anywhere where I
have
Hi,
After seeing two people respond saying that this was feasible and
checking what Wilson had in his config against mine I did a little more
digging. (Thanks Arno, your e-mail came in as I was writing this and
confirmed the info about Pools. Also I'm running 1.36.3. )
I believe I have sorted
Hi,
Good points on a number of things but a few comments need to be made.
1) I'm not attempting to use spooling as a backup method that I want to
restore from. I'm using spooling as its intended for, to avoid
shoe-shining. I backup a number of clients servers at remote sites and
their network
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 22:01, Sean O'Grady wrote:
Hi,
After seeing two people respond saying that this was feasible and
checking what Wilson had in his config against mine I did a little more
digging. (Thanks Arno, your e-mail came in as I was writing this and
confirmed the info about
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 22:37, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
Sean O'Grady wrote:
Hi,
...
I believe I have sorted out what my issue with this is. As I didn't post
my complete configs and only the ones that I thought would be relevant I
ended up only giving half the picture. What was
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 23:24, Sean O'Grady wrote:
Hi,
Good points on a number of things but a few comments need to be made.
1) I'm not attempting to use spooling as a backup method that I want to
restore from. I'm using spooling as its intended for, to avoid
shoe-shining. I backup a
Hello,
I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour and
how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage Device.
The basics of my setup are multiple clients and a single Storage device.
I specify that all Jobs will be spooled and that there is a Maximum
12 matches
Mail list logo
