Re: [Bacula-users] Delay between end of despool and spooling again

2009-05-14 Thread Mattinson David
Building, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX, United Kingdom http://www.qinetiq.com/home/notices/legal.html Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:50:42 -0400 From: K. M. Peterson kmp.lists+bacula-us...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Delay between end of despool and spooling again

Re: [Bacula-users] Delay between end of despool and spooling again

2009-05-13 Thread K. M. Peterson
Dave, A really interesting question this is. I can't answer it. But, I would ask you this: if the spooling time elapsed is near to the despool time, then why spool at all? Our setup was set up originally with all jobs spooled (and we have the same Quantum Superloader/Drive that you do); I

[Bacula-users] Delay between end of despool and spooling again

2009-05-12 Thread Mattinson David
Hi I have installed Bacula-3.0.1 (gcc 3.4.3) on a Solaris 10 10/08 Sun T5420 server with a Quantum Superloader DLT-S4 attached. postgreSQL database. I use a spool area of 5GB and the backup always progresses to normal completion no btape issues. The normal sequence of events for a local 360GB