Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+

2011-09-22 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:30:10 -0400 "R. Leigh Hennig" wrote: > watchdog/n > ksoftirqd/n > migration/n > events/n > kblocked/n > cqueue/n > aio/n > ata/n > kmpathd/n > xfslogd/n > ib_cm/n > rpciod/n > > Where "n" is some number between 0 and 23. Is this normal? Does this > look right to you guys?

Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+

2011-09-22 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 09/22/2011 09:30 AM, R. Leigh Hennig wrote: > I have Bacula 5.0.2 installed and have a number of clients (15 in total) > and storage resources (5 total), and on the system that my director is > installed on has about 433 active processes. This seems very excessive. > The vast, vast majority of t

Re: [Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+

2011-09-22 Thread Michael Galloway
thats all quite normal for a system with a large number of cpu's. on my 48 core boxes, there are more than 700 processes running when its idling :-) this is just the system managing the IO/etc between the cpus and the other subsystems. --- michael On 09/22/2011 09:30 AM, R. Leigh Hennig wrote

[Bacula-users] How many active processes should Bacula spawn? Seeing over 400+

2011-09-22 Thread R. Leigh Hennig
I have Bacula 5.0.2 installed and have a number of clients (15 in total) and storage resources (5 total), and on the system that my director is installed on has about 433 active processes. This seems very excessive. The vast, vast majority of them are these processes: watchdog/n ksoftirqd/n migrat