On Thu, 19 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote:
As far as I know, NTFS has similar timestamps - atime, mtime and ctime - as
normal unix file systems. I'm not sure, but I think I remember reading
somewhere that under Windows you can avoid changing them when you modify a
file.
There are more attributes t
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 02:02:37 +0200, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Arno> Ryan LeBlanc wrote:
>> Arno, thank you for your response.
>>
>> Here are our details:
>>
>> Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has
>> ext2 partitions mounted (rw)
Ryan LeBlanc wrote:
Arno, thank you for your response.
Here are our details:
Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has
ext2 partitions mounted (rw)
Ok, the server doesn't matter here, I think.
The client is running Windows XP, no special mount options, just windows
defaul
Arno, thank you for your response.
Here are our details:
Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has
ext2 partitions mounted (rw)
The client is running Windows XP, no special mount options, just windows
default. NTFS format on the partition
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hell
Hello,
Ryan LeBlanc wrote:
We are running tests with Bacula to see if it will work in our
environment. So far, we are very impressed!
We have, however, run into a small problem. We do a full backup of a
folder, and all files are copied as expected. We then put a file into
this folder. It, howev
We are running tests with Bacula to see if it will work in our
environment. So far, we are very impressed!
We have, however, run into a small problem. We do a full backup of a
folder, and all files are copied as expected. We then put a file into
this folder. It, however is an old file with a c